The 2nd IEEE Internatioal Workshop on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Their Applications, 2003. HAVE 2003. Proceeding
DOI: 10.1109/have.2003.1244724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of effects of packet loss on speech quality in VoIP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that perceived quality of packet loss concealed speech varies with codec and PLC types, packet size, loss pattern, and loss rate [7]. Our experiments suggest that PESQ and P.563 accuracy is also sensitive to such parameters.…”
Section: Plc Impairment Modelingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is known that perceived quality of packet loss concealed speech varies with codec and PLC types, packet size, loss pattern, and loss rate [7]. Our experiments suggest that PESQ and P.563 accuracy is also sensitive to such parameters.…”
Section: Plc Impairment Modelingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As the G.729 is a CELP-based codec, the use of linear predictive model of speech production can lead to variations in codec performance with different talkers or languages [18]. Support for such a speculation can be found in at least two studies using the same codec [6], [19], which, in case of zero packet loss and using different speech samples from the ITU-T data set [20], rendered measured I e values of 21.14 and 17.128, respectively, similar to the value obtained for this study. From the curves, a nonlinear regression model can be derived for each I e,k by the least-squares data fitting method.…”
Section: Multi-stream Voice Quality Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, E-Model has the following disadvantages: 1) its listening quality assessment is less accurate than that derived by a signal-based algorithm such as PESQ; 2) it does not consider the variability of network delays and loss rates; and 3) it does not take account of the interaction between different factors, e.g., the interplay between network delay and listening quality, or between network delay and loss rates. To address the above problems, Ding et al [5] proposed a hybrid model that integrates PESQ and E-Model and thereby provides the advantages of both models. We introduce this model in Section 5, and explain how we use it to evaluate the QoE of VoIP communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we employ the QoE measurement model proposed by Ding et al [5] to quantify the overall QoE pro- …”
Section: Qoe Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%