1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199803)52:3<199::aid-ps696>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of effects on non-target plants from sulfonylurea herbicides using field approaches

Abstract: : Since their introduction in the early 1980s, there have been a number of Ðeld studies conducted to assess the e †ects of sulfonylurea herbicides on nontarget plants (i.e. plants not labeled for use). In these studies a wide variety of plant response assessment techniques have been used to measure e †ects on nontarget plants. This paper examines the relationship of short-term plant response measurements to plant productivity measurements such as yield or quality. Whether short-term plant response measurements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these remained chemicals are highly phytotoxic to some rotational plants at only 1% or even less of the originally applied amount, resulting in growth inhibitions of certain rotational crops or fruit trees [1,[3][4]. On the other hand, although low toxicities of sulfonylurea herbicides in animals were reported in the previous studies, more and more recent investigations have verified that these chemicals would pose potential risks to non-target organisms and soil microorganisms [4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these remained chemicals are highly phytotoxic to some rotational plants at only 1% or even less of the originally applied amount, resulting in growth inhibitions of certain rotational crops or fruit trees [1,[3][4]. On the other hand, although low toxicities of sulfonylurea herbicides in animals were reported in the previous studies, more and more recent investigations have verified that these chemicals would pose potential risks to non-target organisms and soil microorganisms [4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that many of these pollutants are inhibitory, toxic and/or mutagenic to plants (e.g., Obrigawitch et al 1998). Exposure to anthropogenic pollutants may also result in significant changes to the genetic makeup of plant populations by contaminant-induced selection (e.g., Antonovics and Bradshaw 1970;Pollard 1980;Keane et al 1998Keane et al , 1999Jiménez-Ambriz et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metsulfuron methyl was selected due to its known specific binding to the acetolactate-synthase enzyme and the resulting inhibition of the synthesis of the branched amino acids valine, leucine, and isoleucine, leading to a rapid cessation of plant cell division and growth (Obrigawitch et al 1998). Hence, strong inhibitory effects on the FWC in exposed M. aquaticum whorls were expected.…”
Section: Positive Control For the Invasive And Non-invasive Observatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposed whorls showed a strongly reduced shoot and root growth, which is in accordance with effects described in the literature (e.g. Brown 1990;Obrigawitch et al 1998). Specifically, effect concentrations of metsulfuron methyl in sediments to M. aquaticum could not be found in the literature.…”
Section: Positive Control For the Invasive And Non-invasive Observatimentioning
confidence: 99%