Field, greenhouse, and laboratory studies were conducted to examine the effect of application timing on the activity of DPX-V9360 on rhizome johnsongrass. Field and greenhouse studies indicated that johnsongrass treated with postemergence applications of DPX-V9360 at late growth stages (>5 leaves) was controlled more effectively than when treated in early growth stages (<5 leaves). Johnsongrass control was optimized with split-postemergence applications (treatments applied at early and late growth stages) in field studies compared to a single postemergence application at either early or late growth stages. The pattern of translocation of 2-14C (pyrimidine)-labeled DPX-V9360 applied to a fully expanded johnsongrass leaf did not differ significantly between three different growth stages of 10-, 30-, and 60-cm height. Over 60% of the absorbed14C remained in the treated leaf. Most of the translocated14C moved out of the treated leaf within 3 days after application and distributed to the shoot in greater quantities than to the rhizomes. About 40% of14C-DPX-V9360 applied to the leaf surfaces of a tolerant species (corn) or susceptible species (johnsongrass) was absorbed into the leaf. Corn metabolized over 90% of absorbed DPX-V9360 within 20 h, while there was no perceptible metabolism of DPX-V9360 in johnsongrass leaves after 24 h. Late growth stage and split-postemergence applications appear to provide more effective control than early growth stage applications because of better control of regrowth (new shoot emergence from rhizomes after application) and because tillering and plant emergence are more nearly complete at application time.
Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] has considerable potential for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentusL.) control in crops commonly produced in the Texas High Plains. Little information is available, however, concerning adsorption characteristics of metolachlor in soils of this region. Adsorption and movement of metolachlor were determined in three commonly occurring soils of the Texas High Plains. Organic carbon contents of the soils by weight varied from 0.3 to 0.5%, and the clay fraction ranged from 16 to 33%. Freundlich adsorption isotherms exhibited two linear regions for each soil, suggesting the possibility of multilayer adsorption. K′ocvalues and coefficients of determination for organic carbon and clay content vs. Freundlich K values indicated that organic matter was the predominant adsorbent for metolachlor in the soils studied. Desorption, soil column leaching, and thin-layer plate studies demonstrated metolachlor to be sufficiently mobile in scils low in organic matter to cause possible crop injury or loss of efficacy.
: Since their introduction in the early 1980s, there have been a number of Ðeld studies conducted to assess the e †ects of sulfonylurea herbicides on nontarget plants (i.e. plants not labeled for use). In these studies a wide variety of plant response assessment techniques have been used to measure e †ects on nontarget plants. This paper examines the relationship of short-term plant response measurements to plant productivity measurements such as yield or quality. Whether short-term plant response measurements have a practical degree of accuracy and precision appropriate for hazard assessment on non-target plants from sulfonylureas is discussed. A comprehensive review of published literature and unpublished Ðeld studies of the e †ects of sulfonylureas on the yield and quality of non-target plant species is reported. When this information is coupled with exposure factors and environmental fate characteristics, the risks to nontarget plants from sulfonylureas are similar to those from other herbicides used at higher application rates.
Metribuzin and the ethyl ester of chlorimuron were evaluated alone and in combination for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans. Neither herbicide alone controlled all broadleaf weeds tested, but combinations showed both complementary and additive action. Two field studies quantified these interactions on broadleaf weeds and showed that low rates of either herbicide alone controlled Pennsylvania smartweed and redroot pigweed. Metribuzin was more effective than chlorimuron in controlling prickly sida and hemp sesbania, while chlorimuron was more effective on common cocklebur, sicklepod, and ivyleaf and pitted morningglories. Additive action was most important on velvetleaf, sicklepod, annual morningglories, and hemp sesbania. Because the components were both additive and complementary, a range of mixture rates and ratios were more effective for weed control than either herbicide alone.
Two 1-yr field studies were conducted to evaluate preemergence and preplant incorporated treatments of alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide], EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), fluridone {1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone}, and metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] for the control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentusL.). Preemergence applications of metolachlor at 2.24, 3.36, and 4.48 kg/ha gave the best control with no significant differences observed among rates of metolachlor. Depth of herbicide incorporation did not result in any significant increase in control. Preplant incorporation of metolachlor at all rates, or fluridone at 0.56 and 0.84 kg/ha provided seasonal control of yellow nutsedge. Translocation of14C-metolachlor applied to the root or shoot of yellow nutsedge was primarily acropetal with some limited basipetal movement. Application of14C-metolachlor to the root or shoot of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundusL.) resulted in mostly acropetal translocation with little movement of14C from the treatment site.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.