2014
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of exposure to shiftwork mechanisms in the general population: the development of a new job-exposure matrix

Abstract: This JEM provides a set of indicators reflecting biologically plausible mechanisms for the potential impact of shiftwork on health and may provide an alternative method of exposure assessment in the absence of detailed job history and exposure data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a JEM to assess exposure to two different types of shiftwork (graveyard shiftwork and early-morning shiftwork) and six mechanistic variables (light at night while working night shifts, phase shift while working night shifts, sleep disturbances while working night shifts, poor diet while working night shifts, lack of physical activity while working night shifts and lack of vitamin D while working night shifts) 22. The definitions of probable exposure to each of the eight variables are outlined in online supplementary table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used a JEM to assess exposure to two different types of shiftwork (graveyard shiftwork and early-morning shiftwork) and six mechanistic variables (light at night while working night shifts, phase shift while working night shifts, sleep disturbances while working night shifts, poor diet while working night shifts, lack of physical activity while working night shifts and lack of vitamin D while working night shifts) 22. The definitions of probable exposure to each of the eight variables are outlined in online supplementary table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitions of probable exposure to each of the eight variables are outlined in online supplementary table 1. The JEM predicts the probability that a particular job (based on ISCO-68 code) involved exposure to each of the eight shiftwork variables 22. As recommended by the creators of the JEM, we used a 30% probability cut-off to classify exposure to each of the shiftwork variables as this cut-off was found to have the most acceptable level of specificity (>75%) without compromising sensitivity (≥70%) 22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of opportunities for refinement in this area, since to date most shift work job exposure matrices have focused on assessing the probability of exposure to night shift work rather than specific characteristics of shift work (such as LAN exposures) that may affect health (32). Quantitative measurements of LAN exposure could be used to develop exposure estimates that are less prone to exposure misclassification and bias versus subjectively defined measures (32), and to test the validity of subjective proxy measures (eg, self-reported exposures or expert assessment).…”
Section: Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of opportunities for refinement in this area, since to date most shift work job exposure matrices have focused on assessing the probability of exposure to night shift work rather than specific characteristics of shift work (such as LAN exposures) that may affect health (32). Quantitative measurements of LAN exposure could be used to develop exposure estimates that are less prone to exposure misclassification and bias versus subjectively defined measures (32), and to test the validity of subjective proxy measures (eg, self-reported exposures or expert assessment). Variance components estimated from quantitative measurements could also be applied to optimize the performance of a shift work job exposure matrix by identifying grouping variables (such as industry, job, or worksite) that most effectively Hall et al discriminate homogenous groups to increase exposure contrast (33).…”
Section: Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%