2014
DOI: 10.5897/jaerd2013.0536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Fadama project phase II in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria

Abstract: This study assessed Fadama project phase II in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to: Assess the need for gender analysis in Fadama project as the basis for policy formation in agriculture; examine benefits and challenges encountered by beneficiaries in the course of involvement in the project. Primary data were used. The data were collected from 100 respondents using simple random sampling technique. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. The results showed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the level of participation in Fadama programme has been low and this has been attributed to a number of factors. Several authors including Adegbite et al (2008), Muhammad et al (2011), Ike (2012), Innih & Dimelu (2013) and Alabi et al (2014) have studied the effects of Fadama II cooperatives on different economic outcomes such as the beneficiaries (FUGs) livelihood, resource use efficiency, optimal plan for Fadama farming, and socio-economic status of the farmers. Meanwhile, few studies have been carried out on the effects of Fadama II cooperatives on poverty alleviation among the farmers, leaving a gap in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the level of participation in Fadama programme has been low and this has been attributed to a number of factors. Several authors including Adegbite et al (2008), Muhammad et al (2011), Ike (2012), Innih & Dimelu (2013) and Alabi et al (2014) have studied the effects of Fadama II cooperatives on different economic outcomes such as the beneficiaries (FUGs) livelihood, resource use efficiency, optimal plan for Fadama farming, and socio-economic status of the farmers. Meanwhile, few studies have been carried out on the effects of Fadama II cooperatives on poverty alleviation among the farmers, leaving a gap in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%