Assessment of Flow through Microchannels for Inertia-Based Sorting: Steps toward Microfluidic Medical Devices

Abstract

The development of new standardized test methods would allow for the consistent evaluation of microfluidic medical devices and enable high-quality products to reach the market faster. A comprehensive flow characterization study was conducted to identify regulatory knowledge gaps using a generic inertia-based spiral channel model for particle sorting and facilitate standards development in the microfluidics community. Testing was performed using 2–20 µm rigid particles to represent blood elements and flow rates of 200–5000 µL/min to assess the effects of flow-related factors on overall system performance. Two channel designs were studied to determine the variability associated with using the same microchannel multiple times (coefficient of variation (CV) of 27% for Design 1 and 18% for Design 2, respectively). The impact of commonly occurring failure modes on device performance was also investigated by simulating progressive and complete channel outlet blockages. The pressure increased by 10–250% of the normal channel pressure depending on the extent of the blockage. Lastly, two common data analysis approaches were compared—imaging and particle counting. Both approaches were similar in terms of their sensitivity and consistency. Continued research is needed to develop standardized test methods for microfluidic systems, which will improve medical device performance testing and drive innovation in the biomedical field.

A Systematic Analysis of Recent Technology Trends of Microfluidic Medical Devices in the United States

“…With proper calibration, outputs like pressure or flow rate data can be used as indicators for the system performance. For example, previous research [ 70 ] has indicated that monitoring fluctuations in pressure may be an effective tool for optimizing performance of a microfluidic system. Overall, standardization efforts for flow-related testing will be useful for the microfluidic device community.…”

Microfluidics in environmental analysis: advancements, challenges, and future prospects for rapid and efficient monitoring

“…Despite the increasing integration of microfluidics in environmental devices, there is a lack of specific EPA/WHOrecognized standards for microfluidic-based environmental monitoring, which poses a significant obstacle to device development and approval. 329 Standardized regulatory guidance documents regarding performance, sample integrity, interference mitigation, and calibration procedures are necessary to ensure accuracy, reliability, and user safety in environmental monitoring applications. In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health took a significant step forward in regulating microfluidics-based medical devices by developing a new leakage testing tool.…”

Ensuring food safety: Microfluidic‐based approaches for the detection of food contaminants

“…Unfortunately, there is a lack of specific FDA standards tailored for microfluidics, necessitating manufacturers to either adapt existing standards or devise novel methodologies to demonstrate performance and secure patentability. As commercialization continues to grow, governmental organizations should develop more standards and quality assurance for innovators seeking to develop marketable microfluidic products 100 …”