2016
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.81.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Gamma Rays Induced Cytotoxicity in Common Wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.)

Abstract: SummaryThe present study was conducted to understand the effects of different doses of gamma radiations on the cytological behavior of common wheat (Triticum aestivum var. WH-147) in M 1 generation. Progenies were raised from the seeds of the selected cultivar treated with six different doses of gamma radiations, viz., 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 kR at Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai. Cytological studies were carried out in the treated as well as in control materials. The radiations have shown a significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, similar types of meiotic abnormalities were found in all mutagenic treatments but the frequency of abnormalities was dissimilar in different treatments, indicating the diverse mutagenic potentials of mutagens against Capsicum annuum L. The induction of cytological disturbances in the mitotic as well as meiotic cells is of great value, as it results in genetic damage that is handed over to the next generation. The different types of chromosomal abnormalities observed during the present study have also been reported by various other workers after treatment with physical as well as chemical mutagens in many crops like Crotalaria juncea (Verma and Raina 1991), Phlox drummondii (Verma and Sharma 2000) and Triticum aestivum (Verma and Khah 2016). Most of these workers have obtained a dose-dependent increase in meiotic aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the present study, similar types of meiotic abnormalities were found in all mutagenic treatments but the frequency of abnormalities was dissimilar in different treatments, indicating the diverse mutagenic potentials of mutagens against Capsicum annuum L. The induction of cytological disturbances in the mitotic as well as meiotic cells is of great value, as it results in genetic damage that is handed over to the next generation. The different types of chromosomal abnormalities observed during the present study have also been reported by various other workers after treatment with physical as well as chemical mutagens in many crops like Crotalaria juncea (Verma and Raina 1991), Phlox drummondii (Verma and Sharma 2000) and Triticum aestivum (Verma and Khah 2016). Most of these workers have obtained a dose-dependent increase in meiotic aberrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They suggested that multivalents were main cause of segregation irregularity at anaphase. In addition, another cause of irregular division of chromosomes at anaphase-I may be due to abnormal behavior of univalents (Verma and Khah 2016).…”
Section: Meiotic Behavior Of Colchitetraploidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liman et al, (2012) reported that occurrence of lagging chromosomes was due to the failure of the chromosome or acentric chromosome fragments to move to either of the pole at anaphase stage. However, Verma & Khah (2016) revealed that the most frequent aberration was chromosomal stickiness in gamma irradiated M 1 generations of T. aestivum. Gaulden (1987) explained that sticky chromosomes is characterized by losing the function of one or two types of specific nonhistone protein which control chromatid separation and segregation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That's why this process effects the structure of DNA and mitosis (Singh, 1983). Depending on radiation dose, different types of chromosome aberrations such as stickiness, laggards, fragments, bridges, fault polarization and micronuclei can be shown in nuclei (Beadle, 1932;Sakin et al, 2005;Verma & Khah, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%