2014
DOI: 10.5897/ajb2014.13884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity analysis in contrasting sugarcane varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers

Abstract: Sugarcane second larg on an und sugarcane polymorphi and reprod pair group and VI with for the OPA or coefficie matrix reve lowest simi useful to fu to meet the Key words: group metho TRODUCTION garcane is a ccharum offi arly 70% su tivated in mo garcane is m Corresponding a uthor(s) agree t ternational Lice. 3736-3741, 10 AJB2014.13884 r: 12AA2D9473 5 014 n the copyrigh cademicjourn Research sment o ugarca pol kanand Pra Sardar Vallab ent of Bioscie is an impo gest agro-ind erstanding genotypes ic DNA mark uc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rest (SCoT9, SCoT40 and SCoT30) failed to give an alone band. The existence of like bands refer to that primer familiar in the genome a unique annealing site, so excess possibility of produce a unique plant variety fingerprint [23][24][25].…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of Some Tomato Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rest (SCoT9, SCoT40 and SCoT30) failed to give an alone band. The existence of like bands refer to that primer familiar in the genome a unique annealing site, so excess possibility of produce a unique plant variety fingerprint [23][24][25].…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of Some Tomato Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest (SCoT9, SCoT40 and SCoT30) failed to give an alone band. The existence of like bands refer to that primer familiar in the genome a unique annealing site, so excess possibility of produce a unique plant variety fingerprint[23][24][25].The primer (SCoT40) yielded the lowest primer efficiency value (0.113), but the primer (SCoT54) yielded a better value (0.681). Among the primers tested, SCoT36 had the highest discriminatory value (18.42), followed by SCoT6, SCoT44, and SCoT54 (each with a value of 7.894), and SCoT9 and SCoT60 (all of which gave no value).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%