2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12892-012-0116-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes, using EST-derived SSR markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic similarity coefficient observed in our study (0.510–0.885 in case of RAPD; 0.167–0.867 in case of SSR; and 0.503–0.853 in case of pooled data of RAPD and SSR) was comparable with earlier reports (Bhat et al 1999; Kumar and Sharma 2009; Yepuri et al 2013). It is a general practice to use a dominant (RAPD) and a codominant (SSR) markers for diversity studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genetic similarity coefficient observed in our study (0.510–0.885 in case of RAPD; 0.167–0.867 in case of SSR; and 0.503–0.853 in case of pooled data of RAPD and SSR) was comparable with earlier reports (Bhat et al 1999; Kumar and Sharma 2009; Yepuri et al 2013). It is a general practice to use a dominant (RAPD) and a codominant (SSR) markers for diversity studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The molecular techniques of RAPD (Bhat et al 1999; Ercan et al 2004; Kumar and Sharma 2009; Pham et al 2011; Akbar et al 2011; Mahdizadeh et al 2012), AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) (Laurentin and Karlovsky 2006, 2007), ISSR (inter-simple sequence repeats) (Kim et al 2002; Parsaeian et al 2011; Kumar and Sharma 2011; Nyongesa et al 2013; Woldesenbet et al 2015), SSR (Spandana et al 2012; Dixit et al 2005; Cho et al 2011; Wang et al 2012; Yepuri et al 2013; Wei et al 2014; Surapaneni et al 2014; Uncu et al 2015; Dossa et al 2016; Sehr et al 2016), and SRAP (sequence-related amplified polymorphism) (Li and Quiros 2001; Li et al 2007; Zhang et al 2010) have been used to evaluate the genetic diversity in sesame of different origins. Morphologically, Indian collection of sesame is characterized by variable forms being cultivated in different agroclimatic zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend also applied for trinucleotide SSRs with a predominance of AT-rich repeats, similar to our findings. Whether or not mononucleotide repeats are included in SSR surveys, all reports on genic SSR development in sesame indicate dinucleotide repeats as the predominant SSR type in coding sequences (Wei et al, 2008;Wei et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012;Yepuri et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014). In addition, AG/CT was consistently found as the predominant motif in sesame genic SSRs.…”
Section: Simple Sequence Repeat Development and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple sequence repeats are widely used in plant molecular genetic studies because they are hypervariable, reproducible, relatively abundant, and provide extensive genome coverage (Powell et al, 1996). Reports on SSR marker development in sesame are limited and most work involved the development of genic SSRs, either from expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences in public databases (Wei et al, 2008;Yepuri et al, 2013) or transcriptome sequencing (Wei et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2014). Fewer authors described genomic SSRs in sesame (Dixit et al, 2005;Spandana et al, 2012;Wei et al, 2014;Surapaneni et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, morphological markers have limitations in their ability to estimate genetic diversity because of strong influence from environmental factors, which make them highly dependent on the cultivation conditions. Molecular marker mediated diversity analysis is considered ideal due to its abundance, hyper-variability, multi-allelic and codominant nature (Sharma et al, 2009;Yepuri et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014;Sehr et al, 2016). Since the studies on genetic diversity analysis combining morphological and molecular markers are limited in Indian sesame germplasm, the present study was carried out to compare the genetic diversity in sesame genotypes using morphological traits and SSR markers.…”
Section: Issn: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 06 (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%