2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of groundwater salinity and quality in Gaza coastal aquifer, Gaza Strip, Palestine: An integrated statistical, geostatistical and hydrogeochemical approaches study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A widely applied approach to evaluate GW salinization, is surely the one that employed geostatistical methodologies such as multivariate statistical analysis [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126]. In a recent study, Slama and Bouhlila have strengthened this approach by adding hydrogeochemical modelling to further constrain seawater-freshwater mixing [127].…”
Section: Data Handling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely applied approach to evaluate GW salinization, is surely the one that employed geostatistical methodologies such as multivariate statistical analysis [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126]. In a recent study, Slama and Bouhlila have strengthened this approach by adding hydrogeochemical modelling to further constrain seawater-freshwater mixing [127].…”
Section: Data Handling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine an average value of L for the contribution area of each well, we extracted the water table grid from the simulation results of MODFLOW, converted this grid to a GIS shapefile, subtracted that from the corresponding ground surface elevation and computed a weighted average of this difference based on the feature areas. Equation (14) was used due to its simplicity. However, it must be kept in mind that this equation gives approximated values and it should be realized that only advection is considered herein without for instance the inclusion of the dispersive flow.…”
Section: Well Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This described situation entails a double drawback as in the one hand the competitive use caused a quantity problem while in the other hand the agricultural practices had led to quality deterioration [1,3,4]. Generally, the elevated nitrate concentrations in the groundwater of the West Bank and Gaza Strip are of increasing concern [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the concentration of ammonia in the phreatic groundwater of the study area ranges from 0.01 mg/L (nine samples lower than the detection limit) to 14.20 mg/L; 10a), reflecting the influence of anthropogenic activities. Nitrate, a ubiquitous contaminant of natural water resources that is mainly caused by agricultural activities such as the application of fertilizer and manure [16,34,59], varies within a large range from 0.01 to 102.00 mg/L (nitrate-N) in the local phreatic groundwater; 23.7% (14 of 59) of the samples are attributed to the lowest level of the standard for groundwater quality of P. R. China [40] (Level-5), 10 of which were sampled from the farmland (Figure 10b). The test results of Pb, Hg, Zn, Cu, Cd, and Ni indicate that the local phreatic groundwater is slightly polluted by heavy metals; 8.5% Figure 10), suggesting a pointsource pollution trend.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Activities Affecting Groundwater Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%