1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(96)00753-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of injection volume limits when using on-column focusing with microbore liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the retention coefficients used to calculate the theoretical maximum injection volume using the approach of Mills et al [18], a 0.27 g/mL strychnine standard was analyzed with an Agilent (Palo Alto, CA, USA) 1100 HPLC system with an ultra-violet multiple wavelength detector (MWD-UV), at λ = 254 nm. A 10 L sample was injected onto a Phenomenex (Torrence, CA, USA) Luna C-18(2), 5 m particle size, 150 mm × 2.0 mm column with a Phenomenex Luna C-18(2), 5 m particle size guard column.…”
Section: High Performance Liquid Chromatography On-column Focusing Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the retention coefficients used to calculate the theoretical maximum injection volume using the approach of Mills et al [18], a 0.27 g/mL strychnine standard was analyzed with an Agilent (Palo Alto, CA, USA) 1100 HPLC system with an ultra-violet multiple wavelength detector (MWD-UV), at λ = 254 nm. A 10 L sample was injected onto a Phenomenex (Torrence, CA, USA) Luna C-18(2), 5 m particle size, 150 mm × 2.0 mm column with a Phenomenex Luna C-18(2), 5 m particle size guard column.…”
Section: High Performance Liquid Chromatography On-column Focusing Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean retention (N = 3) coefficient for the sample solvent was 22.19 with a mean plate number of 338. A maximum injection volume of 73 L was calculated for the chromatography conditions to be used in the method using these values [18]. We elected to use a 50 L injection volume to allow for possible matrix interferences.…”
Section: Calculation Of Maximum Injection Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is taken to profit for analyzing components present in trace amounts in the sample. Indeed, very large sample volumes can then be introduced in the column, which leaves a sufficiently large amount of these trace analytes in the column for leading to high enough detection signal-to-noise ratios at the column outlet and precise enough quantitative analysis [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. If, instead, the sample solvent is stronger than the mobile phase, the analyte migration velocity in the sample solvent is larger than in the mobile phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to increase the sensitivity when using the miniaturized technique, some approaches have been proposed to overcome the mentioned drawbacks, allowing analysts to applying nano-LC to real samples analysis. Among the different solutions proposed, the use of (1) sensitive and specific detectors, e.g., MS, (2) UV-detector cells with extended path length, (3) on-column focusing (Mills et al, 1997;Cappiello et al, 2002;Rocco et al, 2013b;Buonasera et al, 2009), and (4) pre-and/or 2D-column preconcentration are currently employed (Vissers et al, 1997).…”
Section: Improving Sensitivity In Nano-liquid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%