2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.744737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of instantaneous cognitive load imposed by educational multimedia using electroencephalography signals

Abstract: The use of multimedia learning is increasing in modern education. On the other hand, it is crucial to design multimedia contents that impose an optimal amount of cognitive load, which leads to efficient learning. Objective assessment of instantaneous cognitive load plays a critical role in educational design quality evaluation. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been considered a potential candidate for cognitive load assessment among neurophysiological methods. In this study, we experiment to collect EEG signal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the test–rest approach is valid to prove the stability of results, especially in longitudinal studies, it is not the most suitable test to assess the impact of pre-processing on quantitative estimation when repeated measurements are not provided. In this context, a series of papers have been recently published in which the performances of machine learning approaches to classify the MWL level after different signal pre-processing pipelines were compared [ 36 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. These works are focused only on the automatic classification accuracy, considering several features extracted from all the EEG frequency bands and electrode signals, e.g., ERP, as input to the algorithm, whereas any direct evaluation of the EEG features extracted is provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the test–rest approach is valid to prove the stability of results, especially in longitudinal studies, it is not the most suitable test to assess the impact of pre-processing on quantitative estimation when repeated measurements are not provided. In this context, a series of papers have been recently published in which the performances of machine learning approaches to classify the MWL level after different signal pre-processing pipelines were compared [ 36 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. These works are focused only on the automatic classification accuracy, considering several features extracted from all the EEG frequency bands and electrode signals, e.g., ERP, as input to the algorithm, whereas any direct evaluation of the EEG features extracted is provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Temporal Contiguity: corresponding words and visuals are presented at the same time. Find more details about the stimulus in our previous work 15 . Two linguists in English language teaching devised the scenario for making educational multimedia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were randomly assigned to watch lesson 11 NP, then lesson 6 P (n = 21) or lesson 6 NP and then lesson 11 P (n = 18). The data were collected in previous studies 15 , 41 . Specifically, 29 participants remained in the first condition, and 28 participants remained in the other condition after removing participants due to the following reasons: incomplete recording (n = 2), noisy data (n = 7), to find details see Preprocessing subsection, and too low post-test score (n = 2 in the first condition and n = 1 in the other).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EEG has been used to quantify cognitive load through event‐related potentials (ERPs), and an inverse relationship has been found between the amplitude of ERPs and the cognitive load experienced during the completion of a working memory task (Ortiz et al, 2020; Tamanna & Parvez, 2021). EEG frequency bands can also classify high versus low cognitive load, with a reported accuracy of about 84.5% (Sarailoo et al, 2022). In addition to providing electrophysiological information, MEG yields a better spatial resolution of source localisation compared with EEG (Baillet, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%