2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Landsat atmospheric correction methods for water color applications using global AERONET-OC data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, MRPD is always positive for Acolite, but it is negative for all bands for C2RCC and Polymer. The higher estimates of R r s relative to in-situ values from the blue to green bands using the Acolite DSF scheme are consistent with those from previous studies [6], [55]. The overestimation of Acolite derived R r s is likely attributed to the underestimation of aerosol loads or differences between the estimated AOT and the true aerosol properties [7], [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, MRPD is always positive for Acolite, but it is negative for all bands for C2RCC and Polymer. The higher estimates of R r s relative to in-situ values from the blue to green bands using the Acolite DSF scheme are consistent with those from previous studies [6], [55]. The overestimation of Acolite derived R r s is likely attributed to the underestimation of aerosol loads or differences between the estimated AOT and the true aerosol properties [7], [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The continuing improvement in applications has led to widespread use of scientific products from broad scale ocean color sensors [14]. However, validation and intercomparisons of the methods applied to medium-to high-resolution environmental satellite data return mixed results [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The results from these validation and inter-comparison exercises show that performance at the blue end of the spectrum (coastal blue and blue) and in turbid waters (inland and coastal) were most challenging for the systems and none was shown to work consistently well for all water types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies used atmospheric constituent values delivered from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) (Xu et al, 2020;Doxani et al, 2018). However, we decided to use MODIS retrieved values, which have already been successfully used for atmospheric correction assessment (Martins et al, 2017;Sola et al, 2018)…”
Section: Atmospheric Constituents Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%