2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of microbiologically influenced corrosion in oilfield water handling systems using molecular microbiology methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Total Cell density isolation was gauged through serial dilution in sterile broth and plating on Anaerobic Blood Agar. The most probable number assay estimated SRB density ( Senthilmurugan et al, 2021 ). Biomass of the entire microbial community was determined using the Bradford protein assay ( Bradford, 1976 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total Cell density isolation was gauged through serial dilution in sterile broth and plating on Anaerobic Blood Agar. The most probable number assay estimated SRB density ( Senthilmurugan et al, 2021 ). Biomass of the entire microbial community was determined using the Bradford protein assay ( Bradford, 1976 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the praxis, monitoring many microbial groups is unfeasible and therefore it is important to establish a handful of microbes that can be routinely monitored, in a sense, acting as proxy for the overall microbial threat. Although one can argue that in the last decades such a role has been fulfilled by cultivable SRB and APB (Sowards et al, 2014;Okoro and Amund, 2015;Permeh et al, 2017;Senthilmurugan et al, 2021), the recent technological advances have brought to light the need to rethink both the microorganisms being monitored and the way they are monitored (Mukherjee et al, 2017;Koerdt, 2021;McDaniel et al, 2021;Pilloni et al, 2022).…”
Section: Mic Biodiversity As Source For Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of absolute quantification by qPCR, the use of the same nucleic acids extraction protocols and 16S primer pairs used for sequencing is recommended for consistency and bias reduction. A more robust characterization can include the use of functional marker genes for additional quantification of discrete physiological groups such as sulfate reducers (apsA, dsrA genes) and methanogenic archaea (mcrA) (Ben-Dov et al, 2007;Schippers and Blazejak, 2011;McKay et al, 2017;Senthilmurugan et al, 2021). The integration of relative and absolute abundances of the different taxonomic levels and physiological groups allows to identify and pinpoint the most relevant populations targeted for mitigation plans as well as for routine monitoring.…”
Section: Assembling a Roadmap For Mic Field Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) untuk memantau gen tertentu yang diminati. Amplifikasi dan sekuensing gen 16S rRNA untuk mengidentifikasi jenis mikrobiota yang ada dalam sampel lingkungan [49].…”
Section: Metode Investigasi Dan Deteksi Micunclassified
“…Sistem assessment menggunakan metode kupon untuk mengukur laju korosi, mikrobiologi molekuler qPCR dan NGS (next generation sequencing) dapat mendeteksi kelompok mikroorganisme bakteri pereduksi sulfat Desulfovibrio dalam jumlah besar. Hasilnya telah memberikan gambaran rinci tentang status mikroba dari berbagai sistem dan lebih dapat dipercaya daripada metode MPN (most probable number) konvensional [49].…”
Section: Metode Investigasi Dan Deteksi Micunclassified