2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-019-01688-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of neural networks and time series analysis to forecast airborne Parietaria pollen presence in the Atlantic coastal regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific works examining the diurnal pollen variation in the air only seldom apply deterministic predictive models, narrowing their efforts down to descriptive methods and correlation analysis (Chappuis et al 2020;Fernández-Rodríguez et al 2014;Š čevková et al 2015). The most common predictive techniques used so far are linear or nonlinear regressions, with significant steps having been made the last few years (Nowosad et al 2018;Piotrowska, 2012;Ritenberga et al 2016), and timeseries analysis, based on Box-Jenkins methods (García-Mozo et al 2014;Ocana-Peinado et al 2008;Valencia et al 2019). Also, variables like meteorological factors are frequently considered, as they have been proven as significant predictors of airborne pollen concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scientific works examining the diurnal pollen variation in the air only seldom apply deterministic predictive models, narrowing their efforts down to descriptive methods and correlation analysis (Chappuis et al 2020;Fernández-Rodríguez et al 2014;Š čevková et al 2015). The most common predictive techniques used so far are linear or nonlinear regressions, with significant steps having been made the last few years (Nowosad et al 2018;Piotrowska, 2012;Ritenberga et al 2016), and timeseries analysis, based on Box-Jenkins methods (García-Mozo et al 2014;Ocana-Peinado et al 2008;Valencia et al 2019). Also, variables like meteorological factors are frequently considered, as they have been proven as significant predictors of airborne pollen concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, novel and more sophisticated forecasting techniques are starting to be employed, as in the case of machine learning, which is increasingly gaining scientific interest. Several aerobiological studies have implemented machine learning algorithms, at various scales of analysis, such as artificial neural networks (Iglesias-Otero et al 2015;Puc, 2012;Valencia et al 2019), random forests (Nowosad et al 2018;Zewdie et al 2019), and support vector machines (Zewdie et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Artificial Neural Networks have become particularly popular in modelling the non-linear behaviour of pollen (Astray et al 2016). ANNs are composed of individual neurons in multiple layers, mimicking the biological neural system and is able to learn from complex, noisy, incomplete data to model non-linear relationships (Valencia et al 2019).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the growing global problem of increasing pollen allergenicity, wide varieties of studies have addressed the prediction of allergic risk periods caused by high pollen concentrations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. In such situations, it is important to find a set of variables that enable the early prediction of pollen counts through the application of intelligent models [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%