2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of offshore platforms under extreme waves by probabilistic incremental wave analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional run of pushover analysis only considers the 100-year design crest height for the ultimate collapse. However, when the RSR is higher, the wave height will also become higher [38]. However, no comprehensive study is carried out as to the effects of the wave-in-deck load, which are excluded during the RSR determination [38] as shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Wave-in-deck Load and Reserve Strength Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional run of pushover analysis only considers the 100-year design crest height for the ultimate collapse. However, when the RSR is higher, the wave height will also become higher [38]. However, no comprehensive study is carried out as to the effects of the wave-in-deck load, which are excluded during the RSR determination [38] as shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Wave-in-deck Load and Reserve Strength Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the collapse wave height was higher than the platform deck, and this led to the wave-in-deck scenario. Based on Golafshani et al [38], the wave-in-deck load was ignored during the determination of RSR in the pushover analysis. In the conventional pushover analysis using USFOS software, the 100-year return period environmental load is incremented until the platform is collapsed and generate the ultimate resistance of the jacket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Dolsek [27] used the strategy to propagate uncertainty in a reinforced concrete building and evaluate its seismic performance through IDA. This approach was applied by Golafshani et al [28] in 2011 to propagate uncertainty in an existing jacket type offshore platform and to assess it under extreme waves through a probabilistic incremental wave analysis.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Seismic Performance and Reliability Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fragility analysis has been commonly adopted in the performance-based assessment of buildings under seismic loads, it is still possible to encounter the use the similar analysis for other structure types. Golafshani et al (2011) assessed the performance of a jacket offshore platform under extreme waves. Golafshani et al (2011) based the assessment on a framework named probabilistic incremental wave analysis, which has considerable similarity with the incremental dynamic analysis and the applied framework considers the uncertainties associated with the sea state parameter, structural response, and collapse capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Golafshani et al (2011) assessed the performance of a jacket offshore platform under extreme waves. Golafshani et al (2011) based the assessment on a framework named probabilistic incremental wave analysis, which has considerable similarity with the incremental dynamic analysis and the applied framework considers the uncertainties associated with the sea state parameter, structural response, and collapse capacity. Zeinoddini et al (2018) also assessed the structural integrity of offshore platforms against extreme irregular waves where the stochastic nature and the uncertainties in the ocean waves were taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%