2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:hydr.0000025274.47757.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No other taxa were found to be common for either stillwater muddy and torrential riffle and/or for muddy and riparian plant substrate. This finding is in a good agreement with the conclusions of Brabec et al (2004) who proved that the lotic and lentic habitats in a river differ in taxonomic composition, ecological traits and biotic indices of macrozoobenthos. On the other hand, 16 taxa were recorded as affined to both torrential and riparian mesohabitats, the majority of them belonging to the families Chironomidae and Naididae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No other taxa were found to be common for either stillwater muddy and torrential riffle and/or for muddy and riparian plant substrate. This finding is in a good agreement with the conclusions of Brabec et al (2004) who proved that the lotic and lentic habitats in a river differ in taxonomic composition, ecological traits and biotic indices of macrozoobenthos. On the other hand, 16 taxa were recorded as affined to both torrential and riparian mesohabitats, the majority of them belonging to the families Chironomidae and Naididae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This pattern was more pronounced in water pollution determinants (saprobic index) than in the determinants of morphological habitat degradation (channelization). Significant relationships between abiotic (BOD, nutrients) and biotic (saprobic index of macrozoobenthos) indicators of organic enrichment were identified also by Brabec et al (2004). On the other hand, the morphological man-made modifications of the river channel were found to be the main factor negatively affecting lowland river macroinvertebrates and their biodiversity under conditions of homogenous (low) pollution loading (Horsák et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In order to relate the measured environmental variables with macroinvertebrate community structure, defined in PCA components, Pearson correlations were performed (between site scores along the axes and environmental variable values). A set of metrics and index to assess quality in lotic ecosystems (see Brabec et al, 2004;Buffagni et al, 2004;Offenböck et al 2004) were computed for both sites over the study period (Table 2). The objective of those calculations was to detect temporal patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merritt et al, 2002). Such composite trophic indices responded to organic pollution (Brabec et al, 2004;Pinto et al, 2004), periphyton cover, dissolved oxygen, sulphuric acid, sodium, potassium or conductivity , land use (Feld & Hering, 2007) and floodplain fragmentation (Paillex et al, 2007). Bö hmer et al (2004) eliminated an index of trophic integrity from a multimetric index because the trophic index 'fluctuated strongly, regardless of watercourse type and cause of impact ' (p. 222).…”
Section: Biological Traits and Multiple Stressors 97mentioning
confidence: 99%