2017
DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2017.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of patients’ knowledge level regarding the informed consent from the ethical aspect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 80.4% of the patients did not have a university degree and had a high school and diploma. Also, 56.8% of the patients were unemployed or retired [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, 80.4% of the patients did not have a university degree and had a high school and diploma. Also, 56.8% of the patients were unemployed or retired [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consent is generally given in writing, but in some cases it may be verbal, especially for interventions that are non-invasive and relatively safe [ 17 ]. In a study (2011), where they consciously assessed the level of knowledge of surgical patients, it was found that the majority of patients (70.2%) did not have sufficient knowledge about this issue, which confirms our results [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to contest consent because the patient was not provided with enough information to make an informed decision. Thus, it is imperative to furnish true, sufficient, and pertinent information in a language and style that is understandable to the patient-preferably without resorting to technical scientific jargon (Itir Erkan, 2017) The details of the planned procedures, the possible dangers and advantages of the process, the alternatives to the proposed method, including the natural course of nontreatment, and medical facts regarding the patient's health should all be included in the information given. (Bushra Ashraf, 2014) , In addition to discussing the risks, doctors can establish a system to ensure that relevant information about expected outcomes, possible alternatives, and what to expect before and after the procedure is communicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an ethical obligation of health care professionals to uphold patients' autonomy and let them decide on the proposed medical, surgical, or other health care and research interventions (2). The consent is generally obtained in written but, in some cases, it may be verbal especially for the non-invasive and relatively nonrisky interventions like vital-sign and pelvic examination, Breast Examination to obstetrics and gynecologic client (1,3) Several factors may affect informed consent, including the patient's competence, provision of limited information, unsuccessful communication between patients and professionals, the hospital environment itself, privacy issues, and inadequate time (1,2,4). The informed consent process is vital to patients; however, patients vary in their views of its purpose with the dominant view being enabling patients' selfdecision-making (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%