2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of personal exposure from radiofrequency-electromagnetic fields in Australia and Belgium using on-body calibrated exposimeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Joseph et al 32 measured a median total E RMS value of 0.09 V/m over several rural locations in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Bhatt et al 1 measured an average E RMS value of 0.07 ± 0.04 V/m in rural environments in Belgium. Both previous studies of rural RF-EMF exposure are close to what we found in this manuscript and certainly within the measurement uncertainty of 3 dB on our measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joseph et al 32 measured a median total E RMS value of 0.09 V/m over several rural locations in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Bhatt et al 1 measured an average E RMS value of 0.07 ± 0.04 V/m in rural environments in Belgium. Both previous studies of rural RF-EMF exposure are close to what we found in this manuscript and certainly within the measurement uncertainty of 3 dB on our measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All E values were translated to power density (Sinc) values using: Sinc = E²/377, in each frequency band. During measurements where two ExpoM-RF devices were used simultaneously by the same researcher, geometric means of Sinc obtained with the two ExpoM-RFs were computed using the formula: Geometric mean= (Sinc,1 × Sinc,2) 1/2 , since this reduced the measurement uncertainty on the mean (Thielens et al, 2015;Bhatt et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Data Processing and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous findings (Beekhuizen et al 2013;Sagar et al, 2016;Urbinello et al 2014a) suggest that a path that requires at least 15 min of transportation time yields a reproducible arithmetic mean exposure measure. However, measured RF-EMF data can show a highly non-Gaussian distribution (Bhatt et al, 2016b), which implies that small (logarithmic) changes in the data could have a large effect on the arithmetic mean. Thirdly, there have been almost no studies that validate PEM measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations