2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of predictive models for characterizing the atomization process in a spray dryer’s bi-fluid nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low yield at 283 L•h −1 is caused by the corresponding droplet size (Table S1) because a large droplet will stick to the wall of drying chamber before being dried. The droplet sizes at different spray drying conditions were calculated by using an empirical formula for the bi-fluid nozzle (see details in Discussion S2) [25]. The droplet decreases in size as X 1 is increased (Table S1), just as for the resulted particle size.…”
Section: Single-factor Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low yield at 283 L•h −1 is caused by the corresponding droplet size (Table S1) because a large droplet will stick to the wall of drying chamber before being dried. The droplet sizes at different spray drying conditions were calculated by using an empirical formula for the bi-fluid nozzle (see details in Discussion S2) [25]. The droplet decreases in size as X 1 is increased (Table S1), just as for the resulted particle size.…”
Section: Single-factor Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deviations are most likely due to the overestimating impacts of liquid properties, especially viscosity, on SMD. It has been argued that liquid properties in the two-fluid nozzle are weaker driving forces in determining SMD, compared to process conditions-e.g., relative velocities [28,34,35]. This is especially the case at higher relative velocities where high aerodynamic forces suppress the impacts of fluid properties.…”
Section: Data Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bi-fluid nozzles, which are commonly utilized at the laboratory scale, droplet size is chiefly determined by the physical properties of the liquid feed (e.g., viscosity, surface tension, and density), the atomizing gas to liquid mass flow rate ratios, and the nozzle size and/or design. 31 As such, any change in solvent will impact dissolution performance due to alterations in the droplet (particle) size when otherwise holding the remaining process parameters constant. This underscores the importance of conducting intrinsic dissolution studies to control for surface area when investigating solvent effects exclusive of the atomization process.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of solvent choice in SDDs has garnered increasing attention regarding its potential to influence key formulation properties such as homogeneity, physical stability, and dissolution performance. Several rationalizations have been offered to explain solvent effects in SDDs, which include changes in droplet size, kinetic effects arising from varying evaporation rates, and thermodynamic processes attributed to drug–polymer–solvent interactions prior to and during the drying event. For bi-fluid nozzles, which are commonly utilized at the laboratory scale, droplet size is chiefly determined by the physical properties of the liquid feed (e.g., viscosity, surface tension, and density), the atomizing gas to liquid mass flow rate ratios, and the nozzle size and/or design . As such, any change in solvent will impact dissolution performance due to alterations in the droplet (particle) size when otherwise holding the remaining process parameters constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%