Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1868688.1868691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of product derivation tools in the evolution of software product lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes a graphical modelling environment that visualise relationships of feature in a SPL and supports the automatic derivation of the products. An assessment for other frameworks and commercial tools supporting product configuration in a SPL such as GEARS, pure:variants , Captor, CIDE, MSVCM, XVCL, GenArch is done in (Torres et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes a graphical modelling environment that visualise relationships of feature in a SPL and supports the automatic derivation of the products. An assessment for other frameworks and commercial tools supporting product configuration in a SPL such as GEARS, pure:variants , Captor, CIDE, MSVCM, XVCL, GenArch is done in (Torres et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several tools for managing variability in SPLs, and Torres et al present an assessment of some of these tools (Pure::variants, Hephaestus, GenArch, ColorIDE, and XVCL) in the context of SPL evolution [17]. We decided to use Pure::variants and Hephaestus to implement the tool support for our approach, since our goal here is to investigate the use of annotative and compositional methods to manage SPL variability of UVA Simulink models.…”
Section: Tool Support For Modeling Spl Variability In Simulink Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%