2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of radiographic factors affecting surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of impacted canines of the palate: A 15-year retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
41
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Each digital panoramic radiograph was measured using image J as follows ( Figure 2): Angle: Angle created by the long axis of the palatally impacted canine to the midline constructed on the OPG 13,27,28 Horizontal: Linear horizontal distance of the palatally impacted canine cusp tip to the midline constructed on the OPG Vertical: Linear vertical distance of the palatally impacted canine cusp tip to the occlusal plane constructed on the OPG using the mesial-buccal cusp of the first molar and the incisal distal margin of the maxillary central incisor 12,15,27 Data from the experimental and control groups were subgrouped from least deviated (subgroup 1) to most deviated (subgroup 3) according to impaction condition (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each digital panoramic radiograph was measured using image J as follows ( Figure 2): Angle: Angle created by the long axis of the palatally impacted canine to the midline constructed on the OPG 13,27,28 Horizontal: Linear horizontal distance of the palatally impacted canine cusp tip to the midline constructed on the OPG Vertical: Linear vertical distance of the palatally impacted canine cusp tip to the occlusal plane constructed on the OPG using the mesial-buccal cusp of the first molar and the incisal distal margin of the maxillary central incisor 12,15,27 Data from the experimental and control groups were subgrouped from least deviated (subgroup 1) to most deviated (subgroup 3) according to impaction condition (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The angulations and position of the canines in the dental arch, the overlap between the lateral incisor and canine and the presence of root anomalies have all been discussed as having a role in the treatment decision. 18,21,22 Using low-dose cone beam CT (CBCT) images to assess the impacted canine in a three-dimensional (3D) representation has shown clear benefits for both diagnosis and prognostic estimates on eruption as well as treatment planning. [23][24][25][26] Most studies have compared conventional radiology and CBCT, showing a superiority of CBCT in assessing the exact position of impacted canines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson stwierdził, że postępowanie ortodontyczne w przypadku przedsionkowo położonych kłów szczęki jest wielokrotnie trudniejsze niż w przypadku ich podniebiennej pozycji i jest obciążone dużym ryzykiem niepowodzenia (41). W przypadkach podjęcia leczenia ortodontycznego konieczna jest dokładna ocena pozycji abnormal root anatomy and likelihood of effective canine movement into the dental arch (36). Bishara states that serious root angulation or damage to tissues of a canine that stays in the bone are contraindications for its removal (Fig.…”
Section: Review and Discussion Extraction Of An Impacted Toothunclassified