2019
DOI: 10.2319/111418-809.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forced-eruption time for palatally impacted canines treated with and without ostectomy-decortication technique

Abstract: Objectives: To compare forced-eruption times for palatally impacted canines treated with and without the ostectomy-decortication technique and to assess the influence of palatally impacted canine pretreatment position and angle on forced-eruption time. Materials and Methods: The sample was composed of 118 patient-subjects with 151 palatally impacted canines treated with the ostectomy-decortication technique (n = 72) and witho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…50 In a recent analysis by Ferguson et al on 151 palatally impacted teeth, 51 they found that this method around the impacted teeth will provide 2 to 4 times increase in the rate of tooth movement compared with closed exposure. 51,52 It includes performing ostectomy between the adjacent teeth to provide a pathway from the impacted canine crown to the final archwire position but leaving about 1.5 mm of bone interproximally. Furthermore, it should be followed by penetrations over the root prominence of the impacted tooth toward movement direction.…”
Section: Different Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 In a recent analysis by Ferguson et al on 151 palatally impacted teeth, 51 they found that this method around the impacted teeth will provide 2 to 4 times increase in the rate of tooth movement compared with closed exposure. 51,52 It includes performing ostectomy between the adjacent teeth to provide a pathway from the impacted canine crown to the final archwire position but leaving about 1.5 mm of bone interproximally. Furthermore, it should be followed by penetrations over the root prominence of the impacted tooth toward movement direction.…”
Section: Different Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it should be followed by penetrations over the root prominence of the impacted tooth toward movement direction. 51 Outcome evaluations: open vs closed surgeries. In terms of periodontal health, Parkin et al has concluded that these two techniques present no impact on the prognosis of the palatally impacted canines after the treatment.…”
Section: Different Surgical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51] Forced-eruption time can be significantly reduced using ostectomy-decortication [ Figure 6]. For a detailed description of the ostectomy-decortication technique see Wilcko et al [52] and Ferguson et al [53] In a study with 118 patients, 57 treated with ostectomy-decortication and 61 with open-closed surgical exposure, forced-eruption time was on average 6.6 months for the ostectomy-decortication group and 21.0 months for the open-closed surgical exposure group. [53] Forced-eruption time is the time between surgery date and date the canine which was tied into the orthodontic arch wire in a position similar to the adjacent teeth.…”
Section: Surgical Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palatally impacted canine (PIC) forced-eruption time averaged 6.6 months using the ostectomy-decortication technique compared with 21.0 months using open-closed surgical exposure techniques (i.e. 3.2 times more rapid) [30]. Fischer [31] reported six cases of bilateral PICs treated in a splitmouth design with randomly assigned surgical exposure on one side and selective alveolar decortication (without ostectomy) on the other; the treatment duration was 28-33% more rapid in the corticotomyassisted technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%