2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2879321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Real‐Time Compaction Quality Test Indexes for Rockfill Material Based on Roller Vibratory Acceleration Analysis

Abstract: Compaction quality is directly related to the structure and seepage stability of a rockfill dam. To timely and accurately test the compaction quality of the rockfill material, four real-time test indexes were chosen to characterize the soil compaction degree based on the analysis of roller vibratory acceleration, including acceleration peak value (ap), acceleration root mean square value (arms), crest factor value (CF), and compaction meter value (CMV). To determine which of these indexes is the most appropria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows that the initial compactness of subgrade after initial compaction by roller is not completely the same, but all are about 85%. The reason for this difference is considered to be the sudden acceleration or deceleration of the roller during driving [ 14 ]. Considering that the degree of compaction will be improved by hydraulic compactor reinforcement, the small initial compaction difference can be allowed in the actual construction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 shows that the initial compactness of subgrade after initial compaction by roller is not completely the same, but all are about 85%. The reason for this difference is considered to be the sudden acceleration or deceleration of the roller during driving [ 14 ]. Considering that the degree of compaction will be improved by hydraulic compactor reinforcement, the small initial compaction difference can be allowed in the actual construction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference is the compaction equipment utilized. Numerous scholars have determined the dynamic response between vibratory or impact roller compactors and soil [10][11][12][13][14], while others have analyzed the dynamic response between the impact rammer and soil concerning dynamic compaction of subgrade [15]. However, minimal research has explored the dynamics of the hydraulic compactor, an efficient and omni-directional reinforcement machine [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCV (Zhang et al , 2017) provides an approach to assess the compaction quality based on acoustic wave detection. The CF (Hua et al , 2018) describes the waveform changes in the vibration acceleration, which was relevant to the compactness. The CSD (Kimmel and Mooney, 2011) is a measurement of the pad strain to assess the soil stiffness.…”
Section: Bibliometric Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the variation can be used to describe the compaction states of filling materials [44]. Among the compaction degree indexes based on harmonic analysis, CMV and CCV are most widely used, and the harmonic components are easy to extract, with definitions given in equations (4) and (5) [45].…”
Section: Compaction Degree Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%