2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/eucap.2017.7928743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of RF human exposure to LTE small-and macro-cells: UL case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While RF-EMF exposure induced in either second generation (2G) or third generation (3G) SC networks was addressed in [8][9][10][11], rare works considered exposure induced in fourth generation long-term evolution (4G-LTE) HetNets, even though LTE traffic accounted for 69% of mobile traffic in 2016 [1]. Indeed, EMF exposure induced in LTE HetNets has been assessed using simulations in [12] and through a measurement campaign in an urban environment in [13], though in the latter, only the UL exposure in one specific environment was considered. However, both UL and DL need to be characterized in diverse environments to assess the real exposure burden, thus considering larger measurement campaigns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While RF-EMF exposure induced in either second generation (2G) or third generation (3G) SC networks was addressed in [8][9][10][11], rare works considered exposure induced in fourth generation long-term evolution (4G-LTE) HetNets, even though LTE traffic accounted for 69% of mobile traffic in 2016 [1]. Indeed, EMF exposure induced in LTE HetNets has been assessed using simulations in [12] and through a measurement campaign in an urban environment in [13], though in the latter, only the UL exposure in one specific environment was considered. However, both UL and DL need to be characterized in diverse environments to assess the real exposure burden, thus considering larger measurement campaigns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the set of data, two different drive test solutions have been used. By doing so, different antenna characteristics and efficiency of mobiles are considered [7]. Regarding the uplink emitted power from UE in active mode, the drive test hand sets have been programmed to upload 100 MBytes files on a FTP server repetitively.…”
Section: Measurement Methods and Uplink And Downlink Power Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penetration depth is considered to be 6 m in buildings. Each building has 4 floors and the height of each floor is 3 m. The height of the UE from the ground is 1.5 m. Due to the lack of information on the architecture of indoor environment, the penetration loss has been taken into account as a random variable uniformly distributed on the interval [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] dB. Figure 9 and 10 illustrate the structure of the scenario.…”
Section: Uplink Emitted Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondarily, these higher signal strengths will cause the network to reduce the power output of handsets (the uplink). Since in most cases the stronger exposure to cellphone users is from uplink signals from their own devices, the presence of small cells will generally reduce overall RF exposure to a user or a bystander ( Stephan et al 2014 ; Mazloum et al 2017 ). However, many variables determine personal exposure to RF fields, and simple generalizations of this sort do not always apply ( Lonn et al 2004 ; Boursianis et al 2012 ; Durrenberger et al 2014 ; Plets et al 2015 ; Krayni et al 2017 ; Huang 2018 ; Zeleke et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure levels from 5G base stations are under study by several groups, mainly to improve methods to assure their compliance with health and safety guidelines. Assessments have included exposures from stations employing beamforming antennas, as well as exposures from small cells that use stationary beams ( Degirmenci et al 2016 ; IEC 2017; Mazloum et al 2017 ; Baracca et al 2018 ; Kopacz and Heberling 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%