2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of semi-rigid connections in steel structures by modal testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators acknowledged and demonstrated that traditional assumptions of connections being either fixed or pinned can lead to significant errors in the analysis of static (Lee and Moon, 2002) and dynamic response (da Silva et al., 2008; Galvão et al., 2010; Tuürker et al., 2009; Wong et al., 1995), design and sizing of members (Lee and Moon, 2002), as well as design against progressive collapse (Liu et al., 2010). The findings obtained in Section 4.4 of this study also support these earlier studies that neither the fixed nor the pinned connections are acceptable to represent the two‐bolt connection used in the steel frame studied herein.…”
Section: Identification and Prioritization Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators acknowledged and demonstrated that traditional assumptions of connections being either fixed or pinned can lead to significant errors in the analysis of static (Lee and Moon, 2002) and dynamic response (da Silva et al., 2008; Galvão et al., 2010; Tuürker et al., 2009; Wong et al., 1995), design and sizing of members (Lee and Moon, 2002), as well as design against progressive collapse (Liu et al., 2010). The findings obtained in Section 4.4 of this study also support these earlier studies that neither the fixed nor the pinned connections are acceptable to represent the two‐bolt connection used in the steel frame studied herein.…”
Section: Identification and Prioritization Of Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results obtained for the 2D steel frame model, illustrated in reference [19], are used to compare the results provided by the present model. The experimental measurements accomplished in [19] aim at obtaining the frame natural frequencies, the frame mode shapes and the modal damping ratios.…”
Section: Experimental Comparison: 2d Simple Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental measurements accomplished in [19] aim at obtaining the frame natural frequencies, the frame mode shapes and the modal damping ratios. The frame is built using steel bars with a rectangular cross-section of 0.03× 0.01 m. The height and span of the model are equal to 0.90 m. The feets of the model are welded to a flange placed on a concrete block, and beam-to-column connections are welded to each other.…”
Section: Experimental Comparison: 2d Simple Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Türker ve diğerleri [5] modal testle üç çelik yapı üzerinde yarı-rijit bağlantı durumunu değerlendirmiştir. Bu amaçla yapıların dinamik karakteristiklerini deneysel ve analitik olarak belirlemiştir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified