2005
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale using RUSLE and GIS: a case study in the Loess Plateau of China

Abstract: Soil erosion is a serious problem in the Loess Plateau of China, and assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale is urgently need. This study used RUSLE and GIS to assess soil loss in the Yanhe watershed. All factors used in the RUSLE were calculated for the watershed using local data. RUSLE-factor maps were made. The mean values of the R-factor, K-factor, LSfactor, C-factor and P-factor were 970 209 MJ km À2 h À1 a À1 , 0Á0195 Mg h MJ À1 mm À1 , 10Á27, 0Á33359 and 0Á2135 respectively. The mean value o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
161
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
161
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil retention is calculated as soil loss supposedly ignoring vegetation cover and soil erosion control practices minus the current LULC patterns and soil erosion control practices. According to locally developed specific methods calculating factors of the USLE for the Loess Plateau (Zhang et al, 2004;Fu et al, 2005), the equation is expressed as:…”
Section: Soil Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil retention is calculated as soil loss supposedly ignoring vegetation cover and soil erosion control practices minus the current LULC patterns and soil erosion control practices. According to locally developed specific methods calculating factors of the USLE for the Loess Plateau (Zhang et al, 2004;Fu et al, 2005), the equation is expressed as:…”
Section: Soil Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, simply borrowing the model with locally calculated factors may lead to deviation from the actual situation. This model has been criticized for being ineffective for estimating deposition and sediment yield under various conditions, especially in predicting gully erosion (Fu et al, 2005;Beskow et al, 2009). Overestimation may occur on slopes steeper than 30% owing to the USLE algorithms which are highly sensitive to slope gradients (Liu et al, 1994).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative impacts of management options can be easily compared by making changes in the C-factor which varies from near zero for well-protected land cover to 1 for barren areas (Lee and Lee 2006). The reasonable methods to compute C-factor for large scale are extrapolating fromthe plot scale if there are basic data for plots, or evaluating qualitatively if there are no basic data (Fu et al 2005). A land use map of the study area derived from the Landsat Thematic Mapper image taken in 2003 was used as the basis for determining the C-factor values.…”
Section: Cover and Management Practices Factor (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on how they represent spatial variability of erosion processes, models can be categorized into lumped and distributed ones (Aksoy and Kavvas 2005). Both of the models can provide useful information for decision-makers and planners to take appropriate landmanagement measures (Fu et al 2005). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation