2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2012.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of soil structure in the transition layer between topsoil and subsoil using the profil cultural method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar field criteria to assess subsoil quality are described by Manichon (), King (), McKenzie (), Batey & McKenzie (), and Peigne et al . ().…”
Section: Identification Of Soil Compactionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar field criteria to assess subsoil quality are described by Manichon (), King (), McKenzie (), Batey & McKenzie (), and Peigne et al . ().…”
Section: Identification Of Soil Compactionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In our study, the NT practice modified the soil bulk density by having higher values at 20-30 and 30-40 cm layers (Table 6). This is probably the transition layer compaction described in Peigne et al (2013), which could partly explain the observation of lower primary and secondary RLDs under NT than under MP at 20-30 cm (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Corn Roots Affected By Tillage Practicementioning
confidence: 73%
“…These factors can be observed, especially in the areas of Forest, Capoeira and Pasture 4, which may be related to a greater presence of organic matter in the "A horizon" and increased Ma. The use of visual methods for evaluating soil quality has been shown to be effective in reducing subjectivity, especially in assessment of soil structure, compaction, root growth, among other features (McKenzie, 2013;Muphy et al, 2013;Peigné et al, 2013). In the present work, it was possible to establish field-based soil quality indicators sensitive to levels of degraded pastures, as well as to establish a practical method for the determining the levels of degradation in field with good accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%