2017
DOI: 10.3301/rol.2017.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of sources of PCE contamination in groundwater using a Monte Carlo method in the Functional Urban Area of Milano

Abstract: Water Framework Directive and Groundwater Directive (2006/118/CE) represent the main European regulations on water resources quality, requiring the identification and management of contamination sources threatening the achievement of acceptable groundwater quality status. The sources of groundwater contamination can be classified into two different categories: 1) point sources (PS), which are identified areas releasing plumes of high/very high concentrations (i.e. hot-spots) and 2) multiple-point sources (MPS)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplified approach aims at identifying the most probable paths followed by groundwater contamination, which coincide with the groundwater flow directions. An alternative method that applies NSMC considering all the transport processes and the release of contaminant mass can be found in (Alberti et al, 2017), but its application is more complicated as it requires a transport model, which also takes a far higher simulation time compared to particle tracking.…”
Section: Procedures Overview Of Particle Back-tracking Under Uncertai...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplified approach aims at identifying the most probable paths followed by groundwater contamination, which coincide with the groundwater flow directions. An alternative method that applies NSMC considering all the transport processes and the release of contaminant mass can be found in (Alberti et al, 2017), but its application is more complicated as it requires a transport model, which also takes a far higher simulation time compared to particle tracking.…”
Section: Procedures Overview Of Particle Back-tracking Under Uncertai...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). Il modello matematico è stato implementato soltanto per i primi due acquiferi che sono quelli interessati dalla contaminazione, oggetto dello studio successivamente sviluppato attraverso il modello di trasporto (Colombo 2017) e la procedura di modellazione stocastica inversa (Alberti et al 2018(Alberti et al , 2017 Conducibilità idraulica e porosità La risoluzione dell'equazione discretizzata alle differenze finite presuppone la definizione, per ogni singola cella del modello, dei parametri strutturali ed idrogeologici. Le celle del modello sono caratterizzate da condizioni e proprietà idrauliche (carichi, conducibilità idraulica e porosità efficace) di seguito descritte.…”
Section: Implementazione Del Modello Numerico DI Flussounclassified
“…the cells that most probably can host a MPS; 2. clustered MPS: through 100 MC realizations considering variability of contaminant mass released into the shallow aquifer (computed as a product of concentration and Darcy's flow is within a range of 10 -2 -1 mg/s). Using MT3DMS, for each domain sector, it was possible to assess in a probabilistic way, the MPS contaminant distribution and the mass releases frequency (Alberti et al 2017). From many different realizations all calibrated within NSMC (Null Space Monte Carlo suite in PEST), it was therefore possible to provide results in terms of frequency of occurrence that identified areas of high probability to find MPS.…”
Section: Stochastic Numerical Modeling Assessing Diffuse Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%