2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been increasing interest from researchers in UAV spraying operations in orchards and vineyards since 2016. Most studies have focused on the effects of application parameters (flight height and velocity), tree shape, UAV type, nozzle, adjuvant on the spray deposition distribution in the canopy of fruit trees or grapes, ground loss and drift, [10][11][12][13][14] as well as on the comparisons between UAV sprayer and ground applicator. [15][16][17] From 2016 to 2018, we performed a series of spray performance tests in pear orchards using an unmanned octocopter sprayer with 10-L payload (maximum take-off weight 24.8 kg) under the support of China Agriculture Research System -28.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been increasing interest from researchers in UAV spraying operations in orchards and vineyards since 2016. Most studies have focused on the effects of application parameters (flight height and velocity), tree shape, UAV type, nozzle, adjuvant on the spray deposition distribution in the canopy of fruit trees or grapes, ground loss and drift, [10][11][12][13][14] as well as on the comparisons between UAV sprayer and ground applicator. [15][16][17] From 2016 to 2018, we performed a series of spray performance tests in pear orchards using an unmanned octocopter sprayer with 10-L payload (maximum take-off weight 24.8 kg) under the support of China Agriculture Research System -28.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…experimented in citrus trees and found that when the operation height was 1.2 m and the flight speed was 3.5 m s −1 , UAVs gave higher droplet densities and droplet coverage rates. Wang et al 23 . tested the performance of two UAV nozzles types and reported that the application of an air‐injector flat fan nozzle promoted droplet deposition and uniformity and reduced the drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al 22 experimented in citrus trees and found that when the operation height was 1.2 m and the flight speed was 3.5 m s −1 , UAVs gave higher droplet densities and droplet coverage rates. Wang et al 23 tested the performance of two UAV nozzles types and reported that the application of an airinjector flat fan nozzle promoted droplet deposition and uniformity and reduced the drift. Under comprehensive consideration of the density, uniformity and penetration of droplet deposition, Zhang et al 24 concluded that the optimal spraying parameters of UAVs for sugarcane were 15 L ha −1 spray volume, 3 m flight height and 4 m s −1 flight velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic nozzles have a long history and a wide range of types. Wang C. et al (2021) tested the performance of an IDK120–015 air-injector nozzle and a TR 80–0067 hollow cone nozzle. At a speed of 3.11–3.79 m/s in a crosswind, compared with the traditional HCN nozzles of UAV sprayers, the application of AIN promotes spray deposition and uniformity and significantly reduces deposition and air drift.…”
Section: Techniques For Improving the Deposition Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%