2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of standard kε, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the vessel filled with water, the flow was predicted by the standard k-e model, which is commonly applied for prediction of fluid flow in stirred vessels and can give satisfactory predictions of the mean characteristics of the turbulent flow [26][27][28]. For the vessel filled with glycerin, the flow was in the laminar regime and was simulated by the laminar model.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the vessel filled with water, the flow was predicted by the standard k-e model, which is commonly applied for prediction of fluid flow in stirred vessels and can give satisfactory predictions of the mean characteristics of the turbulent flow [26][27][28]. For the vessel filled with glycerin, the flow was in the laminar regime and was simulated by the laminar model.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain relatively accurate results with less computer memory and CPU time, the kε standard turbulence model, due to its fast convergence speed, robust performance and wide application in engineering [31,32], is chosen to simulate the turbulent flow here: (ρk)t+(ρkuj)xj=xj[false(μ+μtσkfalse)kxj]+ρ(Pkε), (ρε)t+(ρεuj)xj=xj[false(μ+μtσεfalse)εxj]+ρεk(C1PkC2ε), where ε denotes the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and k denotes the fluid turbulent kinetic energy. Notice that the known constants used in this model are chosen as σk=1.0, σε=1.3, C1=1.44 and C2=1.92.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-ε model has also been compared to the RSTM (Reynolds Stress Turbulent Model) and LES (Large Eddy Simulation) in the work of B.N. Murthy et al [17]. They found that the standard k-ε model under predicted the turbulent kinetic energy profile in the impeller region and failed to simulate the mean flow associated with the strong swirl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%