1982
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320330030021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Susceptibility to Measles and Rubella

Abstract: We conducted a serological and questionnaire study of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] Data regarding those not on HAART to our knowledge are not published. Of note, while vaccine seroresponse rates in HIV-negative adults are approximately 95% for measles,[24] and 79–95% for mumps,[4] the studies highlighted above for HIV-infected adults report suboptimal seroresponse to measles vaccination varying substantially between 0 and 80%. Studies regarding mumps and rubella vaccination seroresponse rates in those with HIV are yet more scarce and primarily limited to children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Data regarding those not on HAART to our knowledge are not published. Of note, while vaccine seroresponse rates in HIV-negative adults are approximately 95% for measles,[24] and 79–95% for mumps,[4] the studies highlighted above for HIV-infected adults report suboptimal seroresponse to measles vaccination varying substantially between 0 and 80%. Studies regarding mumps and rubella vaccination seroresponse rates in those with HIV are yet more scarce and primarily limited to children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows that our search process revealed 687 unique studies in English, and shows the numbers of studies we excluded according to specific criteria. After review of papers, we further excluded 39 studies that focused on cost minimization for strategies related to: screening of health‐care workers, women of child‐bearing age (for rubella), military recruits, college students, children prior to revaccination, or students before school entry; communications and other measures to encourage vaccination; alternative delivery or vaccine presentations (including hypothetical options); treatment; and different screening tests . We also excluded 13 papers that reported costs only for outbreaks (including any outbreak response efforts that occurred) without analysis of a comparator .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%