2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of SVM, empirical and ANN based solar radiation prediction models with most influencing input parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
51
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consist with the result from Chen and Li [20] who found the modifications to A-P model by individually introducing relative humidity, atmospheric pressure and precipitation gave similar performances to the A-P model. Meenal [173] compared 16 empirical models and also reported that exclusion of relative humidity did not affect the estimation accuracy of sunshine duration models in India. While Yildirim et al [13] found both models SR8 and SR7 significantly outperformed A-P model, as well as 14 sunshine duration models in his work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consist with the result from Chen and Li [20] who found the modifications to A-P model by individually introducing relative humidity, atmospheric pressure and precipitation gave similar performances to the A-P model. Meenal [173] compared 16 empirical models and also reported that exclusion of relative humidity did not affect the estimation accuracy of sunshine duration models in India. While Yildirim et al [13] found both models SR8 and SR7 significantly outperformed A-P model, as well as 14 sunshine duration models in his work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation data have an important impact on the generation of energy, Incidence of radiation and temperature in the power of the PVS1 which is why their prediction studies are developed in the field of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), due to their degree of complexity and uncertainty, based on some applications: Meenal and Selvakumar, (2018); Almorox and Hontoria, (2014); and Almaraashi, (2018). Due to the scope of this 4-month study, your data is limited for the analysis at this point for the time being, for the application of these prediction models, but an example has been developed in the Figure 14, where the objective is to obtain a prediction model of solar radiation the next day (RadSolar2) from the meteorological data of the previous day.…”
Section: Radiation Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of big data mining, machine learning technology has attracted widespread attention. For instance, artificial neural network (ANN) [12][13][14][15][16][17] and support vector machine (SVM) [18][19][20] have been widely applied in solar radiation prediction. Amrouche and Le Pivert (2014) [12] took advantage of spatial modeling and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict daily total solar radiation in four locations in the United States, and the empirical results indicate that the proposed model satisfies the expected accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical analysis of the solar radiation data introduced in Beijing shows that, compared with other benchmark models, the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) generated by the DCE learning method are smaller, and the accuracy rates are 2.96% and 2.83%, respectively. In the forecast one day ahead, Meenal and Selvakumar [20] assessed the accuracy of support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and empirical solar radiation models with different combinations of input parameters. The parameters include month, latitude, longitude, bright sunshine hours, day length, relative humidity, and maximum and minimum temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%