2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the development and implementation of tools in contract cleaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
18

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
13
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…These lower ratings of exertion can probably be explained by the fact that the postures were more convenient, because cleaners were able to work with their arms at a lower level without elevating their shoulders. Similarly, with regard to staircase cleaning the favourable impact of adjustment of the mop on perceived effort and muscular load has previously been reported 19 ) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These lower ratings of exertion can probably be explained by the fact that the postures were more convenient, because cleaners were able to work with their arms at a lower level without elevating their shoulders. Similarly, with regard to staircase cleaning the favourable impact of adjustment of the mop on perceived effort and muscular load has previously been reported 19 ) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Only a limited number of studies have evaluated the effect of adjustment of mop handle on shoulder muscle load. A study of Öhrling et al 19 ) found that in staircase mopping the shoulder muscular activity and perceived exertion were lower when an easily adjustable mop handle was used, compared to a non-adjustable mop. However, it is uncertain whether the high shoulder muscle load during mopping with a figure eight method is partly due to the use of a too-long mop handle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All studies except one (Conner & Irwin, 2009) involved a majority of female cleaning professionals. However, two studies did not report the gender of participants (Kumar, Hägg, & Öhrling, 2008; Öhrling, Kumar, & Abrahamsson, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those factors that have yielded positive results belong to the following major categories of strategies: (a) mop design (Conner & Irwin, 2009; Öhrling et al, 2012; Wallius et al, 2016), (b) mopping methods (Hopsu et al, 2000), (c) mopping technique (Hagner & Hagberg, 1989), and (d) work environment modifications (Kumar et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%