2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the hindered transport model in predicting the rejection of trace organic compounds by nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that diclofenac and ibuprofen are negatively charged, under the experimental conditions electrostatic repulsion contributed to the better rejection obtained for these PhACs relative to carbamazepine. These findings were confirmed by other authors [38], who have shown that negatively charged compounds are more removed by negative surface charged membranes than neutral and positive ones. However, the low overall removal efficiency can be explained by the smaller molecular size of PhACs relative to the pore size of these membranes [37].…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Compound Removalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Considering that diclofenac and ibuprofen are negatively charged, under the experimental conditions electrostatic repulsion contributed to the better rejection obtained for these PhACs relative to carbamazepine. These findings were confirmed by other authors [38], who have shown that negatively charged compounds are more removed by negative surface charged membranes than neutral and positive ones. However, the low overall removal efficiency can be explained by the smaller molecular size of PhACs relative to the pore size of these membranes [37].…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Compound Removalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It has been concluded that NF membrane has a complicated exclusion mechanism, which involves combining both sieving and non-sieving mechanisms. Supporting evidence of this statement can be found in various studies that have concluded that steric hindrance plays a predominant role in the rejection mechanism and that electrostatic effect also has a significant role during the separation process of TrOCs [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. In addition, T. Fujioka et al [ 63 ] compared the ceramic membrane and polymeric NF membrane by evaluating the rejection of TrOCs.…”
Section: Non-sieving Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It describes partitioning through steric hindrance and the Donnan equilibrium theory. : Permeate flux (Jj) vs. transmembrane pressure for feed consisting of 2 g Cr 3+ dm -3 , 10 g Cldm -3 , 10 g SO4 2dm -3 (the dotted line shows the pore model fitted to experimental values) [124] Kong et al employed the DSPM and dielectric exclusion model to predict the performance of two NF membranes for the rejection of six haloacetic acids (HAA) and six pharmaceuticals (PhACs) with different molecular weight, hydrophobicity, and charge [125]. Their model could predict the rejection of HAAs with a mean standard error less than 5%.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling In Nanofiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%