2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02905-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the nutritional value of Gundelia tournefortii during its growth stages as a key element in the Senowbar rangeland ecosystem, Northeast of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Körner et al, (29), at a high altitudes plant cell size did not reduce, instead, their organs become smaller due to a decreases in cell production. Esbati et al, (16), reported that during the vegetative stage, the mean dry matter increases. Data in Table 2 shows the mean carbohydrate percentage was higher in the Mawat location at 12.670% compared with the other locations, which was statistically significant (p<0.01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Körner et al, (29), at a high altitudes plant cell size did not reduce, instead, their organs become smaller due to a decreases in cell production. Esbati et al, (16), reported that during the vegetative stage, the mean dry matter increases. Data in Table 2 shows the mean carbohydrate percentage was higher in the Mawat location at 12.670% compared with the other locations, which was statistically significant (p<0.01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Metabolizable energy (ME) was estimated using the Menke et al [96] where: CP = crude Protein, G 24 = gas production value (mL/200 mg) at 24 h. Relative feed value (RFV) is an index used to estimate the quality of forages compared with reference feeds, i.e., alfalfa at full bloom, which is equal to 100 [97,98]. In addition to forage crops, this index has been used to estimate the quality of various and rangelands species [99][100][101]. The RFV was calculated according to Stalling [102] using the following equation: RFV = (DMD × DMI)/1.29 (2) where: DMD = dry matter digestibility, DMI = dry matter intake, 1.29 = the expected digestible dry matter intake as % of body weight; DMI = 120/(% aNDFom) DMD was estimated using the formula developed by Oddy et al [103]: DMD% = 83.58 − 0.824 ADFom% + 2.626 N%…”
Section: Proximate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%