2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijeg.2008.022067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the outcomes of e-government for good governance: a case of the Land Management Information System in Mozambique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Citizen’s increasing expectations for high-quality service has motivated governments to improve their information technology (IT) usage for the provision of communication and services to parallel interactions between service providers and clients in the commercial market. Apart from improving the relationship between governments and its citizens, e-government also has the potential to revolutionize the functioning of government’s internal processes (Siew and Leng 2003; Macueve 2008). In addition to increasing productivity, e-government provides the possibility for greater transparency, more accountability to constituents, greater information accessibility, and improved cost-efficiency (Shim and Eom 2008; Carter and Bélanger 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen’s increasing expectations for high-quality service has motivated governments to improve their information technology (IT) usage for the provision of communication and services to parallel interactions between service providers and clients in the commercial market. Apart from improving the relationship between governments and its citizens, e-government also has the potential to revolutionize the functioning of government’s internal processes (Siew and Leng 2003; Macueve 2008). In addition to increasing productivity, e-government provides the possibility for greater transparency, more accountability to constituents, greater information accessibility, and improved cost-efficiency (Shim and Eom 2008; Carter and Bélanger 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%