1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0026600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards.

Abstract: The development of a Ward Atmosphere Scale, which differentiates between the social atmospheres of psychiatric inpatient wards, is described. An initial form of the scale was given to patients and staff on 14 wards from Veterans Administration, state, community, private, and university hospitals. The 2nd form of the scale consists of items which significantly differentiate between wards for patients and/or staff. This form includes 12 subscales, e.g., Spontaneity, Autonomy, Affiliation, Aggression, Variety, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
81
1
4

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
81
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of Moos's most important contributions has been the Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS), available in different versions for different settings (Moos, 1997). The WAS is a 100-item scale which purports to measure 10 aspects of the social climate of a unit or institution, and is completed by staff and patients (Moos and Houts, 1968). In recent years the Moos scales have been subject to critiques (for an overview, see Schalast et al, 2008), with critics suggesting that item content is outdated, that the time and effort required for completion is too long for repeated clinical use, and that the low internal consistency of some scales, and discrepancies between the scales and the factor structure of the measure are problematic (Rossberg and Friis, 2003a,b).…”
Section: Measurement Of Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of Moos's most important contributions has been the Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS), available in different versions for different settings (Moos, 1997). The WAS is a 100-item scale which purports to measure 10 aspects of the social climate of a unit or institution, and is completed by staff and patients (Moos and Houts, 1968). In recent years the Moos scales have been subject to critiques (for an overview, see Schalast et al, 2008), with critics suggesting that item content is outdated, that the time and effort required for completion is too long for repeated clinical use, and that the low internal consistency of some scales, and discrepancies between the scales and the factor structure of the measure are problematic (Rossberg and Friis, 2003a,b).…”
Section: Measurement Of Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moos and Houts, 1968;Moos, 1973Moos, , 1975. The Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS) (Moos and Houts, 1968) has been considered the standard instrument for assessing the climate of psychiatric wards in the past. Moos' scales have stimulated empirical investigation of social climates and helped to operationalize important theoretical constructs in the fi eld.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter author's social climate scales are well known and have been used in a number of major studies (e.g. Moos and Houts, 1968;Moos, 1973Moos, , 1975. The Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS) (Moos and Houts, 1968) has been considered the standard instrument for assessing the climate of psychiatric wards in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moos' work covers a range of service settings, including health, mental health, and correctional institutions and draws on his original proposal that three dimensions can capture the climate of an institution: relationship; personal development; and system maintenance and system change (Moos 1975). One of Moos most important contributions to research in this field has been the Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS; available in different versions for different settings, including prisons), a 100−item scale which purports to measure ten aspects of the social climate of a unit or institution, which is completed by both staff and patients (Moos & Houts 1968).…”
Section: How Has Social Climate Been Measured?mentioning
confidence: 99%