2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2009.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of threats to ecosystems in South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
55
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, this is the first systematic threat assessment of plant species at intraspecific level. Our approach complements spatial threat assessments at species and ecosystem level (Jarvis, Touval, Schmitz, Sotomayor, & Hyman, 2010;Ramirez-Villegas, Jarvis, & Touval, 2012;Underwood, Viers, Klausmeyer, Cox, & Shaw, 2009). …”
Section: Trade In Endangered Species (Cites)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As far as we know, this is the first systematic threat assessment of plant species at intraspecific level. Our approach complements spatial threat assessments at species and ecosystem level (Jarvis, Touval, Schmitz, Sotomayor, & Hyman, 2010;Ramirez-Villegas, Jarvis, & Touval, 2012;Underwood, Viers, Klausmeyer, Cox, & Shaw, 2009). …”
Section: Trade In Endangered Species (Cites)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined six maps showing different types of threats associated with human pressure on ecosystems, developed by Jarvis et al (2010), into one map of direct human pressure, which reflects the maximum value among the six threats in each pixel. The six depicted threats are due to (1) human accessibility; (2) conversion to agriculture; (3) fires; (4) grazing pressure; (5) infrastructure; and (6) land clearance because of oil and gas.…”
Section: Direct Human Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of threats, all were divided by 3, which is the 176 maximum value reported by Jarvis et al (2010), in the case of PE and PTP the division 177 was done by 100, and in the case of HD and VD the division was done by the maximum 178 vertical and horizontal distances of the continent (7,505 and 5,170 km, respectively). 179…”
Section: Taxon-and Genus-specific Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%