2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Abstract: syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe drug reactions associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity. There is no consensus on the treatment strategy.OBJECTIVE To explore treatment approaches across Europe and outcomes associated with the SJS/TEN disease course, as well as risk factors and culprit drugs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA retrospective pan-European multicenter cohort study including 13 referral centers belonging to the ToxiTEN ERN-skin subgroup was conducted. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systematic review of the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of epidermal necrolysis, clinical endpoints were defined as mortality rates, length of hospital stay, time to disease cessation, and time to skin healing ( 30 ). A recent European multicenter study sought to assess overall treatment approaches including supportive care only as the reference group and the treatment groups were systemic glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and antitumor necrosis factor agents ( 2 ). This study classified outcomes as risk of infection, body surface area detachment in the acute phase, and an overall 6-week mortality rate between treatment groups ( 2 ).…”
Section: Clinical Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a systematic review of the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of epidermal necrolysis, clinical endpoints were defined as mortality rates, length of hospital stay, time to disease cessation, and time to skin healing ( 30 ). A recent European multicenter study sought to assess overall treatment approaches including supportive care only as the reference group and the treatment groups were systemic glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and antitumor necrosis factor agents ( 2 ). This study classified outcomes as risk of infection, body surface area detachment in the acute phase, and an overall 6-week mortality rate between treatment groups ( 2 ).…”
Section: Clinical Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent European multicenter study sought to assess overall treatment approaches including supportive care only as the reference group and the treatment groups were systemic glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and antitumor necrosis factor agents ( 2 ). This study classified outcomes as risk of infection, body surface area detachment in the acute phase, and an overall 6-week mortality rate between treatment groups ( 2 ). Furthermore, participants were also evaluated for long-term outcomes defined as the development of severe acute complications which included septicemia, acute kidney injury, pulmonary infection, or respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation ( 2 ).…”
Section: Clinical Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Body surface area as the sole determinant of severity Body surface area has an important, validated, and clinically obvious association with in-hospital and early mortality (17,18).…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected mortality rate was 21.1%; the actual mortality rate was 14.7%, and the hospitalisation period was 21.9 days. A European multicentre study 17 included a total of 212 patients (25 Asians) suffering from SJS/TEN, 35.4% of whom were treated with systemic glucocorticoids. 26.4% received gamma globulin/cyclosporine/TNFα; 38.2% received symptomatic and supportive treatment, and the six-week mortality rate was 20.8%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%