2011
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of vector/host contact: comparison of animal-baited traps and UV-light/suction trap for collecting Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), vectors of Orbiviruses

Abstract: BackgroundThe emergence and massive spread of bluetongue in Western Europe during 2006-2008 had disastrous consequences for sheep and cattle production and confirmed the ability of Palaearctic Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to transmit the virus. Some aspects of Culicoides ecology, especially host-seeking and feeding behaviors, remain insufficiently described due to the difficulty of collecting them directly on a bait animal, the most reliable method to evaluate biting rates.Our aim was to compare typic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rieb trap is less efficient than other light traps in terms of number of Culicoides midges collected (del Río et al, 2013); the potential shortcomings of the trapping material might have influence our results on species diversity and distribution. Moreover, light traps do not estimate correctly biting rate and may underestimate -or overestimate -abundance if one peculiar species is not well -or overly -attracted by the light (Viennet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rieb trap is less efficient than other light traps in terms of number of Culicoides midges collected (del Río et al, 2013); the potential shortcomings of the trapping material might have influence our results on species diversity and distribution. Moreover, light traps do not estimate correctly biting rate and may underestimate -or overestimate -abundance if one peculiar species is not well -or overly -attracted by the light (Viennet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Altitude is expressed in meters; latitude and longitude are expressed in decimal degrees; the different animals observed in the area surrounding the trap are described. Genomic DNA was individually extracted following an extraction protocol with Chelex resin in 5% (Resin Chelex100 ® , Chelating Ion Exchange Resin) as previously described (Solano et al, 1997;Viennet et al, 2011). A volume of 500 l of Chelex solution was dispensed into each tube of 1.5 ml.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current surveillance methods, which rely primarily on light traps to catch biting midges, may not be optimally effective. Such traps may not attract all potential vector species equally, and may underestimate numbers of blood-seeking midges in the vicinity of animal hosts (Carpenter et al 2008;Gerry et al 2009; Viennet et al 2011). Following the successful use of traps baited with vertebrate host volatiles to monitor and control other blood feeding insects (Logan and Birkett 2007;Pickett et al 2010), similar technology has been trialled…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are critical for accurately assessing and modeling the dynamics of virus transmission to livestock (Gerry et al, 2001;Carpenter et al, 2008;Baylis, 2009;Guis et al, 2011). In contrast, enclosure trapping or mechanical aspiration of Culicoides midges directly from "bait' livestock has shown biting rates that can be several fold greater than the capture rate obtained using the conventional CO 2 baited suction trap, perhaps because mammalian -feeding Culicoides midges also respond to stimuli other than CO 2 (Mullens and Gerry, 1998;Gerry et al, 2009;Viennet et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%