Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction:YouTube is an open-source platform where creators can record and upload videos for others to see. As the popularity of YouTube increases, it is being increasingly used for healthcare-related information. However, with the relative ease of uploading videos, the content quality of individual videos is not regulated. This study aimed to assess and analyze the content quality of YouTube videos concerning meniscus tear rehabilitation. We hypothesized that most videos would be of low quality.Methods: The keywords "meniscus tear treatment," "meniscus tear recovery," "meniscus tear physical therapy," and "meniscus tear rehabilitation" were used for searching videos on YouTube. A total of 50 videos was analyzed in this study that related to meniscal rehabilitation, grouped into one of four categories: nonphysician professionals (physical therapists and chiropractors) (n=28), physicians (with or without academic affiliation) (n=5), non-academic healthcare-related websites (n=10), and non-professional individuals (n=7). Videos were then assessed by two independent authors using three scoring systems, which included the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN, and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scores. The number of likes, comments, video length, and views were collected for each video. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare quality scores and video analytics.Results: The overall median GQS, modified DISCERN, and JAMA scores were 3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2-3), 2 (IQR: 2-2), and 2 (IQR: 2-2), respectively. Sorted by GQS scores, 20 videos were of low quality (40%), 21 were intermediate (42%), and nine were of high quality (18%). Non-physician professionals produced 56% (28 of 50) of the videos assessed, with physical therapists constituting 86% (24 of 28) of this category. The median duration of each video was 6:54 (IQR: 3:59-10:50) minutes, views was 42,262 (IQR: 12,491), and likes was 877 (IQR: 239-4,850). Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significant difference between JAMA scores, likes, and video length duration between video categories (p<0.028). Conclusion:The overall median reliability of YouTube videos on meniscus tear rehabilitation measured by JAMA and modified DISCERN scores was low. The overall median video quality, as assessed by GQS scores, was intermediate. Video quality was highly variable, with fewer than 20% meeting high-quality standards. As a result, patients are often viewing lower quality videos when researching their condition online.

A content analysis of YouTube videos on tinnitus in South Korea

“…In addition to the PEMAT-A/V, the modified DISCERN tool was used to assess the quality of medical information in the videos. This tool has been widely employed in various studies for the evaluation of medical video quality and has shown correlations with other quality assessment tools such as the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and Global Quality Score (GQS) 9 , 12 , 13 . Our findings indicated relatively lower modified DISCERN scores for video clips produced by non-otolaryngologists, or 'others', with particular deficits observed in the reliability and reference sections of the assessment.…”

“…Each point is allocated for concision, reliability, balance, reference, and uncertainty (Table 2 ). This tool was previously utilized in several studies for the same purpose 9 , 12 , 13 . The score comprises five yes/no questions, with 1 point given for each "yes" answer and 0 points for "no".…”

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren’s Contracture

“…This scoring tool is composed of 15 items directly from the guidelines published by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, which is a method shown to be feasible and accepted in previous literature. 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 One point is assigned for each of the 15 items that are present in the video, and higher scores (max of 15) indicate greater Dupuytren’s contracture-specific content quality.…”

The Current State of Internet Videos Related to Spinal diseases in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…In 2022, more than 35000 certi ed doctors uploaded about 4.43 million popular science videos on TikTok [4]. Meanwhile, Toutiao and Bilibili are also popular and essential channels for health information dissemination in China, with user-friendly experiences on computers, tablets, and smart mobile phones [5]. However, since video-sharing platforms always focus more on entertainment rather than education and professional knowledge, current research suggested that medical content on video-sharing platforms is variable and not comprehensive [6], with questionable authenticity and credibility [7].…”

“…Since medical information on video-sharing platforms has great potential on guiding patients and educating medical students, low-quality and even misleading content may have secondary effects on harming the physical and mental health of the public and the healthy development of the online healthcare industry [13] [14]. As patients continue to turn to the internet for health information and use this information in decision-making related to their health, it is important that the information presented online should be accurate and thorough [15].…”