2013
DOI: 10.1186/cc12526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation: recent advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
85
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, such as the respiratory variation of pulse pressure or the inferior vena cava distensibility, are suitable predictors [8]. Thus, the dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness might optimize intravascular volume and contribute to the improvement of outcomes in septic shock [8]. In our study, all patients with persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion received additional fluid boluses after the initial fluid load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, such as the respiratory variation of pulse pressure or the inferior vena cava distensibility, are suitable predictors [8]. Thus, the dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness might optimize intravascular volume and contribute to the improvement of outcomes in septic shock [8]. In our study, all patients with persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion received additional fluid boluses after the initial fluid load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Central venous and pulmonary wedge pressures are misleading indicators of this response [46]. Instead, dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, such as the respiratory variation of pulse pressure or the inferior vena cava distensibility, are suitable predictors [8]. Thus, the dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness might optimize intravascular volume and contribute to the improvement of outcomes in septic shock [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minimally invasive methods based upon stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) are increasingly used in the general ICU; in patients who are spontaneously breathing, these methods have limited utility. [29][30][31] However, these methods have failed to demonstrate acceptable accuracy in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation, which further questions their role in the ICU. 31 A pulmonary artery catheter may be useful in the management of complex cases in which fluid management is critical, such as patients with respiratory failure or when clinical or radiological findings do not allow differentiation of high-pressure versus low-pressure pulmonary edema and pulmonary infection, in patients with suspected right ventricular dysfunction, or in patients with pulmonary hypertension.…”
Section: Management Of Circulatory Failure Monitoring Circulatory Stamentioning
confidence: 99%