2011
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-11-2729-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of weather-related risk on chestnut productivity

Abstract: Abstract. Due to its economic and nutritional value, the world production of chestnuts is increasing as new stands are being planted in various regions of the world. This work focuses on the relation between weather and annual chestnut production to model the role of weather, to assess the impacts of climate change and to identify appropriate locations for new groves. The exploratory analysis of chestnut production time series and the striking increase of production area have motivated the use for chestnut pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results suggest that chestnut productivity, several quality parameters, and chemical composition of chestnuts are very much influenced by year, which reinforces the importance of climatic conditions on chestnut behaviour and nut quality (Pereira et al, 2011;Dinis et al, 2011a,b;Ferreira-Cardoso, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results suggest that chestnut productivity, several quality parameters, and chemical composition of chestnuts are very much influenced by year, which reinforces the importance of climatic conditions on chestnut behaviour and nut quality (Pereira et al, 2011;Dinis et al, 2011a,b;Ferreira-Cardoso, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For the specific conditions of Portugal, Gomes-Laranjo (2006), Pereira et al (2011) and Dinis et al (2011a) identify some temperature and precipitation predictors, namely mean air temperature from January to March, maximum air temperature in January, July, and September, and the accumulated precipitation of April, May, and September as climatic variables with a high correlation and impact on chestnut production and fruit quality. The results obtained in this experiment seem to corroborate the selection of meteorological parameters by Pereira et al (2011), such as the accumulated rainfall of April, July, and September for a prediction model to simulate chestnut productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation to this, the quality of surface water bodies in mountainous regions tend to suffer degradation from upstream tributaries towards the main stream (Figueiredo et al, 2012), because of a commonly observed altitudinal zonation of land uses whereby forests are located around the headwaters while agriculture and population are concentrated at lower altitudes where soils are more productive (e.g., Rhoades and Thompson, 1975;Pereira et al, 2011). Given their better quality, headwaters may provide a source of high quality water for public and private supply (Santos et al, 2015a), apart from commonly supporting important salmonid fisheries and macroinvertebrate communities (Hutton et al, 2008;Santos et al, 2015b) that are often of a high conservation value (Varandas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum drought in each episode was found usually in the summer. Pereira et al (2011) work focuses on the relation between weather and annual chestnut production to model the role of weather, to assess the impacts of climate change and to identify appropriate locations for new groves. In order to do so a large set of meteorological variables and Normalize Deviation Vegetation Index (NDVI) were computed and their role on chestnut productivity evaluated with composite and correlation analyses identifying variables cluster with an impact on chestnut production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%