2008
DOI: 10.1002/ird.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of wheat and maize water productivities and production function for cropping system decisions in arid and semiarid regions

Abstract: The great challenge of the agricultural sector in countries located in arid and semiarid regions faced with severe water scarcity is to produce more food from less water. This may be achieved by increasing the crop water productivity (WP). Based on experiments conducted in different regions of Iran, it was found that the range of wheat WP was greater than that reported earlier by the FAO. The maize WP was high in the northwestern regions of Iran and less in the southwest. The wide ranges of WP (0.5-1.8 kg m À3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The association of high or moderate WP irrig values with high or moderate yields has important implications for achieving efficient use of water for crop management in water‐scarce areas (Oweis and Hachum, ). In this study, the WP irrig values were higher than those reported for maize by other authors (Igbadun et al , ; Dehghanisanij et al , ; Qureshi et al , ). Since WP irrig expresses the unit increment in yield per unit of applied irrigation water, it is a useful indicator for assessing the impact of an irrigation scheduling practice on crop yield.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The association of high or moderate WP irrig values with high or moderate yields has important implications for achieving efficient use of water for crop management in water‐scarce areas (Oweis and Hachum, ). In this study, the WP irrig values were higher than those reported for maize by other authors (Igbadun et al , ; Dehghanisanij et al , ; Qureshi et al , ). Since WP irrig expresses the unit increment in yield per unit of applied irrigation water, it is a useful indicator for assessing the impact of an irrigation scheduling practice on crop yield.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…6). If other physiological responses of almonds to water availability have a similar shape to that found for g S , then large productivity gains might be found with increases in irrigation rather than a linear relation (e.g., Dehghanisanij et al, 2009). It is particularly interesting to note that both rain-fed and irrigated trees had similar levels of g S for the same level of SWP, indicating that growth under rain-fed conditions Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Studies applying the Stewarts' water-yield approach to barley were not found in literature but various studies are available for spring wheat, which yield responses to water differ little from those of spring barley (Albrizio et al, 2010). Based upon a literature review (Doorenbos and Kassam, 1979;Dehghanisanij et al, 2009;Li et al, 2011;Steduto et al, 2012) and analysis of observed data, the value K y = 1.25 was adopted.…”
Section: Simdualkc and Stewart's Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%