2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0588-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Workload and its Effects on Performance and Injury in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers

Abstract: Fast bowling workload has a well recognised relationship with injury and performance. Although monitoring acute and chronic workloads of fast bowlers remains the most ideal method for identifying preparedness and injury likelihood in fast bowlers, complexities exist that make the systematic prescription of bowling workloads difficult. Advances in technology to monitor workloads may provide further insight into the intensity and workloads of fast bowlers. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015032466.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These may include, but are not limited to; return from injury, competition restrictions, competition strategy, and playing conditions. 16 To a degree, these factors can largely be controlled. However, there are other factors that are much more difficult to account for when preparing fast bowlers, including; the time between bowling innings in multi-day cricket and, the workload 'flow-on' effect amongst the bowlers within the team when one bowler sustains an injury in a competitive match.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may include, but are not limited to; return from injury, competition restrictions, competition strategy, and playing conditions. 16 To a degree, these factors can largely be controlled. However, there are other factors that are much more difficult to account for when preparing fast bowlers, including; the time between bowling innings in multi-day cricket and, the workload 'flow-on' effect amongst the bowlers within the team when one bowler sustains an injury in a competitive match.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher incidence and prevalence of LSF identified in 2016 both in this study and in Australia6 is potentially concerning due to the long time loss associated with this injury. This may in part be associated with increased imaging, detection and routine screening but may also be the result of the increase in the amount of cricket being played across the world 14…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of this research was conducted, the landscape of cricket has drastically altered. Twenty over cricket (T20) has led to the establishment of multimonth blocks of near exclusively T20 fixtures, as well as the proliferation of T20 tournaments leading to a substantial (10%–30%) increase in matchdays 14. This increase in matchdays may explain the higher risk of sustaining an injury compared with the pre-T20 era,15 possibly due to the increased intensity of T20 3 14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerometers housed within global positioning satellite (GPS) units and microsensors have previously been shown to accurately detect bowling events, such as back foot and FFC in training (Rowlands, James and Thiel, 2009), bowling counts in training and competition (McNamara, Gabbett, Chapman, Naughton and Farhart, 2015a), and PlayerLoad across a 12-over bowling spell (McNamara, Gabbett, Chapman, Naughton and Farhart, 2015b). A large positive (r = 0.64) relationship, as determined by a polynomial regression, has also been shown between resultant acceleration (resultant acceleration = [x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ] 0.5 ) and BRV among elite pace bowlers (McNamara, Gabbett and Naughton, 2017). This may be beneficial in the estimation of bowling loads, but this does not provide specific information regarding the actual external loads or GRFs experienced during each delivery as a more direct measure of load experienced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%