2015
DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2015.43012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of WRF/Chem Simulated Vertical Distributions of Particulate Matter from the 2009 Minto Flats South Wildfire in Interior Alaska by CALIPSO Total Backscatter and Depolarization Measurements

Abstract: J. M. Madden et al.120

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These discrepancies can be explained by the timelag between the WRF/Chem cross-sections and the overestimation of wind-speeds. The offsets were of similar magnitude as those found by [47] in another subarctic study. Comparison of WRF/Chem vertical-integrated horizontal distributions of smoke extend with MODIS data (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discrepancies can be explained by the timelag between the WRF/Chem cross-sections and the overestimation of wind-speeds. The offsets were of similar magnitude as those found by [47] in another subarctic study. Comparison of WRF/Chem vertical-integrated horizontal distributions of smoke extend with MODIS data (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the interpretation of the CALIPSO data, we used the same considerations and thresholds as [46] [47]. In theory, perfectly spherical particles show no backscattering in the perpendicular, or orthogonal plane, while irregular shapes cause perpendicular backscattering [43] [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Beaver's air quality was influenced by a wildfire to the southwest in July, and by the Canadian Border fire to the north in September (cf. The NAAQS was exceeded on six consecutive days in July (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), and on three consecutive days in August (15)(16)(17) as well as September (6)(7)(8) (Figure 8 (Table 2).…”
Section: Beavermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher altitudes of wildfire smoke in the model than the observations have also been reported in the previous studies [ Madden et al ., ; Archer‐Nicholls et al ., ], which are generally associated with plume injection height, convective transport, deposition and dispersion process, vertical resolution of the model, and the assumption of a daily constant emission rates of wildfires at the same location [ Val Martin et al ., ; Colarco et al ., ; Kipling et al ., ]. Having aerosol injected into the wrong portion of the vertical column can have many implications; e.g., it can impact the simulated ground‐level air quality [ Colarco et al ., ] and the atmospheric heating rates at different altitudes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%