2011
DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment technologies in schools: ‘deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the early years has become increasingly drawn into the school 'delivery chain' (Ball et al 2012, Moss 2014) partly enabled by the increased circulation and flow of digital data through which teachers measure performance between the input of the nursery to the end of primary school and, recently, explicitly through to exams at age 16.…”
Section: The Impact On Teachers Teaching and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the early years has become increasingly drawn into the school 'delivery chain' (Ball et al 2012, Moss 2014) partly enabled by the increased circulation and flow of digital data through which teachers measure performance between the input of the nursery to the end of primary school and, recently, explicitly through to exams at age 16.…”
Section: The Impact On Teachers Teaching and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased levels of school autonomy and responsibility (as a prerequisite for successful entrepreneurial self-management) along with the diminished role of the state in running the internal affairs of the school are becoming a specific tool, drawing the public sector into entrepreneurial behaviour; at the same time, however, the role of the state paradoxically is being strengthened through the setting of standards and controls in education through across-the-board testing. The use of standardised testing to measure quality is gradually becoming part of the legislation on education, as is the case for example in the USA with the adoption of the No Child Left Behind policy as Suspitzyna (2010) has demonstrated or as in the Education White Paper of 2005 in England as described by Ball et al (2011). Both cases clearly indicate that continual testing of pupil performance is becoming the focal point of the legislation that is being implemented.…”
Section: School Culture In Managerial Strategies For Social Changementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research by Ball et al (2011) has pointed to the fact that within the field in which it operates, the phenomenon of standards, as an expression of the "audit culture", has the ability to arrange and rearrange, shape and reshape anything and to attribute position and identity to anyone. Their study (undertaken in the context of England) on the principles of deliverology and the mechanism of the delivery chain shows how the audit culture, where standards play a central role, has permeated down from the macro-level of administration down to the micro-world of schools and classrooms.…”
Section: School Culture In Managerial Strategies For Social Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If poor performance continues, the school may be closed (Perryman, 2006, p. 149). These pressures of performativity, under such a high-stakes regime, lead, inevitably, to teachers teaching to the test; avoiding innovative and challenging teaching strategies and deploying reductive, low-risk subject knowledge and technical assessment approaches (Ball, 2003;Ball, Maguire, Braun, & Perryman, 2011;Lingard, Martino, & Rezai-Rashi, 2013). This contemporary imperative, of time-consuming emphasis on assessment results and compliance with official school knowledge in school texts and examination board specifications, deflects teachers' (and possibly policy-makers') attention from identifying and challenging colonial discourses that lie within the texts with which they engage.…”
Section: Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%