2020
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/v6gue
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asset Manager Capitalism as a Corporate Governance Regime

Abstract:

Who holds power in corporate America? Scholars have invariably answered this question in the language of ownership and control. This paper argues that tackling this question today requires a new language. Whereas the comparative political economy literature has long treated dispersed ownership and weak shareholders as core features of the U.S. political economy, a century-long process of re-concentration has consolidated shareholdings in the hands of a few very large asset management companies. In an histor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 377 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But their systemic importance in WSC circles is not accidental. It reflects the political economy of macro‐financial reform in high‐income countries after the global financial crisis (Dafermos et al., 2020; Storm, 2018; also Braun, 2020b). Worried primarily by the ‘global banking glut’ (Shin, 2012), that is, excessive cross‐border global bank lending, high‐income countries tightened global banking rules while simultaneously promoting market‐based finance, a ‘resilient’ form of shadow banking dominated by institutional investors and their asset managers (Gabor, 2020; Storm, 2018).…”
Section: Development As De‐risking: a Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But their systemic importance in WSC circles is not accidental. It reflects the political economy of macro‐financial reform in high‐income countries after the global financial crisis (Dafermos et al., 2020; Storm, 2018; also Braun, 2020b). Worried primarily by the ‘global banking glut’ (Shin, 2012), that is, excessive cross‐border global bank lending, high‐income countries tightened global banking rules while simultaneously promoting market‐based finance, a ‘resilient’ form of shadow banking dominated by institutional investors and their asset managers (Gabor, 2020; Storm, 2018).…”
Section: Development As De‐risking: a Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing footprint of these ‘new power brokers of modern capital markets’ (Fisch et al., 2019: 19; also Fichtner et al., 2017) reflects the weakening capacity of the state to tax multinational corporations and high‐net‐worth individuals (that pour their cash into institutional investment vehicles) and to provide traditional welfare to its citizens via public health, pensions, education (prompting them to turn to asset‐based welfare via pension funds and insurance companies), often under the pressure of fiscal austerity discourses (Helgadóttir, 2016). These macro‐financial forces created a portfolio glut, characterized by an unprecedented concentration of capital in the hands of a few global asset managers such as BlackRock (Braun, 2020b).…”
Section: Development As De‐risking: a Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These political forces together have created a portfolio glut. Mirroring the 'banking glut' of the pre-2008 period of financial globalisation, generated by a handful of global banks, the portfolio glut is also characterised unprecedented concentration of capital in the hands of a few global asset managers such as Blackrock (Braun, 2020b).…”
Section: Development As Derisking: a Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die gesamte gesellschaftliche Reproduktion hängt von einer offenen Wirtschaft wie der deutschen von diesen Beziehungen ab. Die Vergleichende Politische Ökonomie bearbeitet diesen Topos seit Jahrzehnten (Braun 2020).…”
Section: Außenpolitik Als Außenwirtschaftspolitikunclassified