2014
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted ultrasound applications for the production of safe foods

Abstract: SummaryUltrasound requires high power and longer treatment times to inactivate microorganisms when compared to ultrasound combined with other technologies. Previous reports have shown that the effectiveness of ultrasound as a decontamination technology can be increased by combining it with another treatment such as pressure, heat and antimicrobial solutions. Assisted ultrasound, the combination of ultrasound with another technology, is more energy efficient, and it has less impact on the food properties. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of methods have been proposed to overcome the natural barrier function of the skin, including future science group www.futuremedicine.com skin patches, ionophoresis, use of chemical enhancers and US-triggered sonophoresis [11]. Interestingly, antimicrobial properties have been reported for US, although its effectiveness strongly varies depending on the targeted type of pathogen (fungi vs bacteria; cocci vs bacilli and Gram-positive vs Gram-negative, among others) [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods have been proposed to overcome the natural barrier function of the skin, including future science group www.futuremedicine.com skin patches, ionophoresis, use of chemical enhancers and US-triggered sonophoresis [11]. Interestingly, antimicrobial properties have been reported for US, although its effectiveness strongly varies depending on the targeted type of pathogen (fungi vs bacteria; cocci vs bacilli and Gram-positive vs Gram-negative, among others) [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the physical aspects, chemical phenomena, such as the formation of reactive species and free radicals, act on the cell envelope by disrupting the cell walls, thus allowing the cell lysis (Sango, Abela, Mcelhatton, & Valdramidis, 2014). Reports on US-induced cell damage show that ruptured and disintegrated cells cannot be revived, which corresponds to an advantage over other nonthermal food processing methods.…”
Section: Food Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ultrasound alone is not very effective in inactivating bacteria on food (Piyasena, Mohareb, & Mckellar, 2003). Ultrasound can be combined with other decontamination technologies for enhancing microbial inactivation (Sango, Abela, McElhatton, & Valdramidis, 2014). The effect of cavitation generated by the ultrasound appeared to enhance the removal of attached or entrapped cells on the surfaces of fresh produce, rendering the bacteria more susceptible to antimicrobial sanitizers (Seymour, Burfoot, Smith, Cox, & Lockwood, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%